Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 8/7/2014 3:05 AM:
> Hello Pikov,
> 
> On 7 août 2014 01:30:57 CEST, Pikov Andropov <[email protected]> wrote:
>>V Stuart Foote wrote on 8/6/2014 6:34 PM:
>>> No great mystery.
>>> 
>>> If they are more conservative--LibreOffice 4.2.6 is a solid build,
>>somewhat lacking in the latest office features.
>>> http://www.libreoffice.org/download/libreoffice-still/
>>> 
>>> If they have more tolerance for change, and accept the potential for
>>some as yet undescribed bugs affecting use, then early adoption of the
>>4.3.0 branch is a reasonable choice.
>>> http://www.libreoffice.org/download/libreoffice-fresh/
>>> 
>>> Both are good well tested software packages.
>>
>>Interesting answer.
>>
>>I think you're saying that 4.2.6 is essentially bugfree, but 4.3.x is
>>not.
> 
> Sigh. Both are NOT bugfree. Stable is a stage and no software ca be bug free.

I didn't say, bugfree, Charles. I said "essentially bugfree". Don't be a
hardass.


-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Reply via email to