Hello Pikov, On 7 août 2014 21:02:17 CEST, Pikov Andropov <[email protected]> wrote: >Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 8/7/2014 3:05 AM: >> Hello Pikov, >> >> On 7 août 2014 01:30:57 CEST, Pikov Andropov <[email protected]> >wrote: >>>V Stuart Foote wrote on 8/6/2014 6:34 PM: >>>> No great mystery. >>>> >>>> If they are more conservative--LibreOffice 4.2.6 is a solid build, >>>somewhat lacking in the latest office features. >>>> http://www.libreoffice.org/download/libreoffice-still/ >>>> >>>> If they have more tolerance for change, and accept the potential >for >>>some as yet undescribed bugs affecting use, then early adoption of >the >>>4.3.0 branch is a reasonable choice. >>>> http://www.libreoffice.org/download/libreoffice-fresh/ >>>> >>>> Both are good well tested software packages. >>> >>>Interesting answer. >>> >>>I think you're saying that 4.2.6 is essentially bugfree, but 4.3.x is >>>not. >> >> Sigh. Both are NOT bugfree. Stable is a stage and no software ca be >bug free. > >I didn't say, bugfree, Charles. I said "essentially bugfree". Don't be >a >hardass.
Sorry, I didn't mean to be! I was just trying to clarify those terms. Cheers, Charles. -- Envoyé de mon téléphone avec Kaiten Mail. Excusez la brièveté. -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
