On Mar 7, 2011, at 15:09 , Reuti wrote: > Am 07.03.2011 um 14:42 schrieb Esztermann, Ansgar: > >> Hi List, >> >> is anyone using the core binding feature on AMD Magny-Cours? If so, how do >> you do it? For me, loadcheck mis-reads the topology as >> (SCTTCTTCTTCTTCTTCTT)*4 rather than (SCCCCCCCCCCCC)*4. As far as I can tell, >> there are two problems: >> - the kernel (2.6.18-194.26.1.el5) only exposes core_id and >> physical_package_id for each core, with core_id running from 0 to 5 and >> physical_package_id from 1 to 4. However, there are two dice (nodes) per >> socket, but this is not shown in the device tree. > > Confirmed. But I wonder, whether it's SGE's fault. Why does the kernel ouptut > the same core id, although it's not the same core?
Well, core IDs are unique only within the same socket ID (for older CPUs, say Harpertown), so I would assume the same holds for node IDs -- it's just that node IDs aren't displayed for Magny-Cours. A. -- Ansgar Esztermann DV-Systemadministration Max-Planck-Institut für biophysikalische Chemie, Abteilung 105 _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users
