寄件者： William Bryce <[email protected]> > Yup, exactly right. That is why we created UniSight. > It is an ETL engine and complete BI server based on Pentaho. > So when you run your report query on 5 million jobs it doesn't take the whole > day.
When are we going to get the source code of UniSight? 寄件者： Rayson Ho <[email protected]> > Another example, GPU integration. A lot of sites don't have CUDA or > OpenCL applications. While Platform's GPU integration is still the > best among all of the solutions provided by major batch systems > (including the new one in Open Grid Scheduler), over 90% of the sites > don't need it. I wanted to take a look at the GPU integration. Where's the OGS download link? --Chi On 2011-10-17, at 2:36 PM, Rayson Ho wrote: > 2011/10/11 Chi Chan <[email protected]>: >> However, if you look at the growth rate of Platform before 2000, Platform >> grew at least 50% per year. Of course >> as companies are larger it is harder to grow, but another factor is that >> there are more Platform LSF competitors, >> like SGE, Torque/Maui, Condor, SLURM, etc, and they have similar >> functionalities but are much cheaper. > > > It has been like that for a few years - nowadays people just switch > from SGE to PBS, LSF to SGE, or to SLURM or Condor, etc... without > worrying much about the features (or lack thereof) in any batch > systems. > > A lot of the distinguishing features in LSF are not used by over 80% > of the users. But people who need those features are willing to pay > the expensive licensing cost! > > For example, Platform has integration for parallel environment for > (almost) each supercomputer platform. So for instance, if you don't > have SGI machines (which over 95% of the sites don't), then you won't > need the SGI MPT integration. > > Another example, GPU integration. A lot of sites don't have CUDA or > OpenCL applications. While Platform's GPU integration is still the > best among all of the solutions provided by major batch systems > (including the new one in Open Grid Scheduler), over 90% of the sites > don't need it. > > And finally, Platform Analytics does reporting properly! I attended a > business analyst workshop a few years ago, and after knowing how > companies are handling their data for analysis, I immediately realized > that the ARCo way was not efficient. While both ARCo & Platform > Analytics store job & cluster information to a database, the way data > is archived & processed makes a huge difference in load of the > database, and the type of queries that can be easily issued by the > cluster administrator. And I used to avoid mentioning this but as > Platform will be owned by IBM it does not matter now - luckily, the > work needed to fix ARCo is not extremely huge, in the end, Platform > Analytics uses a 3rd party front-end, so ARCo can be re-architected to > do very similar things relatively easily. > > Rayson > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > [email protected] > https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users William Bryce | VP of Products Univa Corporation - 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 100 Lisle, Il, 65032 USA Email [email protected] | Mobile: 512.751.8014 | Office: 416.519.2934 _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users
