You can get it....it is called 'Pentaho' http://www.pentaho.com ....you will have to build your own cubes, reports, for it though.
Bill. On 2011-10-18, at 1:29 AM, Chi Chan wrote: > 寄件者： William Bryce <[email protected]> > >> Yup, exactly right. That is why we created UniSight. >> It is an ETL engine and complete BI server based on Pentaho. >> So when you run your report query on 5 million jobs it doesn't take the >> whole day. > > When are we going to get the source code of UniSight? > > > 寄件者： Rayson Ho <[email protected]> >> Another example, GPU integration. A lot of sites don't have CUDA or >> OpenCL applications. While Platform's GPU integration is still the >> best among all of the solutions provided by major batch systems >> (including the new one in Open Grid Scheduler), over 90% of the sites >> don't need it. > > I wanted to take a look at the GPU integration. Where's the OGS download link? > > --Chi > > > > > > > On 2011-10-17, at 2:36 PM, Rayson Ho wrote: > >> 2011/10/11 Chi Chan <[email protected]>: >>> However, if you look at the growth rate of Platform before 2000, Platform >>> grew at least 50% per year. Of course >>> as companies are larger it is harder to grow, but another factor is that >>> there are more Platform LSF competitors, >>> like SGE, Torque/Maui, Condor, SLURM, etc, and they have similar >>> functionalities but are much cheaper. >> >> >> It has been like that for a few years - nowadays people just switch >> from SGE to PBS, LSF to SGE, or to SLURM or Condor, etc... without >> worrying much about the features (or lack thereof) in any batch >> systems. >> >> A lot of the distinguishing features in LSF are not used by over 80% >> of the users. But people who need those features are willing to pay >> the expensive licensing cost! >> >> For example, Platform has integration for parallel environment for >> (almost) each supercomputer platform. So for instance, if you don't >> have SGI machines (which over 95% of the sites don't), then you won't >> need the SGI MPT integration. >> >> Another example, GPU integration. A lot of sites don't have CUDA or >> OpenCL applications. While Platform's GPU integration is still the >> best among all of the solutions provided by major batch systems >> (including the new one in Open Grid Scheduler), over 90% of the sites >> don't need it. >> >> And finally, Platform Analytics does reporting properly! I attended a >> business analyst workshop a few years ago, and after knowing how >> companies are handling their data for analysis, I immediately realized >> that the ARCo way was not efficient. While both ARCo & Platform >> Analytics store job & cluster information to a database, the way data >> is archived & processed makes a huge difference in load of the >> database, and the type of queries that can be easily issued by the >> cluster administrator. And I used to avoid mentioning this but as >> Platform will be owned by IBM it does not matter now - luckily, the >> work needed to fix ARCo is not extremely huge, in the end, Platform >> Analytics uses a 3rd party front-end, so ARCo can be re-architected to >> do very similar things relatively easily. >> >> Rayson >> _______________________________________________ >> users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > William Bryce | VP of Products > Univa Corporation - 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 100 Lisle, Il, 65032 USA > Email [email protected] | Mobile: 512.751.8014 | Office: 416.519.2934 William Bryce | VP of Products Univa Corporation - 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 100 Lisle, Il, 65032 USA Email [email protected] | Mobile: 512.751.8014 | Office: 416.519.2934 _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users
