Joseph Farran <[email protected]> writes: > On 08/30/2012 02:22 PM, Dave Love wrote: >> That doesn't actually demonstrate that it's on the relevant nodes (e.g. >> qconf -se), though I'll believe it is. The -w v messages suggest that >> there's no load report from those nodes. What OS is this, and what load >> values are actually reported by one of those nodes? > > $ cat /etc/redhat-release > Scientific Linux SL release 5.7 (Boron)
I can only say it works fine here on up-to-date RH5. > If I understand you correctly, the load being reported: > > $ qhost -F | grep mem_free > hl:mem_free=3.281G > hl:mem_free=3.341G > hl:mem_free=3.343G > hl:mem_free=7.142G > hl:mem_free=3.248G > <snip> In the absence of any knowledge about that cluster, that doesn't confirm that it's reported for the specific hosts that the scheduler complained about, just that it's reported for some. Look explicitly at the load parameters from one of the hosts in question. Is mem_free there? Is anything else missing (see load_parameters(5))? -- Community Grid Engine: http://arc.liv.ac.uk/SGE/ _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users
