On 06.07.2016 16:24, Suderman Keith wrote:
-1 to a breaking change (in 2.5 or 3.0). I agree with Jason, breaking changes
only for methods that are widely considered to be broken.
if no breaking changes even in a new major version, then when?
-1 to a new method. While a new method may be better than a breaking change I
don’t like to see Object’s namespace become even more polluted with marginally
useful methods. I don’t think the current behaviour is so offensive that it
requires an additional method on Object; is `x.with { it }` really that bad?
yes, I feel the namespace for Object is too polluted already as well.
bye Jochen
