For me, MVP sounds too much like Minimum Viable Product :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimum_viable_product

On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 8:32 PM, MG <mg...@arscreat.com> wrote:

> Following the sports analogy, what about
>
> "Groovy MVPs"
>
> ?
>
> Any game can have Most Valuable Players (even if only one is typically
> crowned in the US), and I think "Groovy announced its 2018 MVPs" has a nice
> ring to it.
>
> Cheers,
> mg
>
>
>
> On 19.02.2018 12:03, Søren Berg Glasius wrote:
>
> I disagree with MG.
>
> A star is an object that shines, and in this case shines light on the
> Groovy language and ecosystem. Hence I think the name is both professional,
> and since it can be directly linked to the star in the Groovy logo I think
> it makes perfect sense. In sports you also have star players and in music
> (and Java) you have rock stars. That you can find examples that relates to
> games on Nintendo does not make a valid point IMO. The "All Stars" just
> makes it so much better - as that's what Paul, Jochen and others are .
>
> My few cents worth.
>
> /Søren
>
> On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 at 17:02 MG <mg...@arscreat.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 18.02.2018 13:38, Eric Kinsella wrote:
>>
>> +1up on Groovy Stars.
>>
>>
>> "Get a life" ;-)
>>
>> But seriously, all the people one-upping "Groovy Stars" - consider
>> whether that name really sends the right professional message with regards
>> to Groovy ? I am convinced it does not.
>> Managers who might decide whether Groovy can be used in a project are
>> typically conservative and sensitive to those things, and they do not
>> normally follow nerd humor... (next suggestion I see coming along the
>> Stars-crossed-line, is to call Paul and Jochen "Groovy All Stars")
>>
>> As another example, it looks like "Pokemon Stars" on the Nintendo Switch
>> might become a reality:
>> http://www.techradar.com/news/pokemon-stars-all-the-latest-
>> leaks-from-the-rumored-nintendo-switch-game
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 6:13 AM, Daniel Sun <realblue...@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Paul,
>>>
>>>      “Groovy Champions” make people associate it with "Java Champions"
>>> easily. As for "Groovy Stars", it is interesting but let me associate
>>> "Song
>>> Stars" and "Kungfu Stars" easily... I wish other people would not
>>> associate
>>> as I do...
>>>
>>>       Similarly, many years ago some one suggested to name current
>>> "Grape"
>>> as "Groovy Baby", the latter is interesting but not formal...
>>>
>>>       To sum up, +1 to “Groovy Champions”.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Daniel.Sun
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Users-f329450.html
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
> Best regards / Med venlig hilsen,
> Søren Berg Glasius
>
> Hedevej 1, Gl. Rye, 8680 Ry, Denmark
> Mobile: +45 40 44 91 88 <+45%2040%2044%2091%2088>, Skype: sbglasius
> --- Press ESC once to quit - twice to save the changes.
>
>
>


-- 
Guillaume Laforge
Apache Groovy committer & PMC Vice-President
Developer Advocate @ Google Cloud Platform

Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/
Social: @glaforge <http://twitter.com/glaforge> / Google+
<https://plus.google.com/u/0/114130972232398734985/posts>

Reply via email to