Thanks Owen Rubel & Paul King for your replies! And thanks for pointing out the bug in JSONSlurper! I thought that I use it because it is available in Groovy. I've used Jackson Jr before, and it does exactly what I want, so I go with that instead.
/Tommy Från: Owen Rubel <oru...@gmail.com> Svara: users@groovy.apache.org <users@groovy.apache.org> Datum: 8 juli 2022 at 17:36:59 Till: users@groovy.apache.org <users@groovy.apache.org> Ämne: Re: Using Groovy 4.0.1 and want to use Groovys JsonSlurper or whatever it might be called in version 4. So JSONSlurper is now a static class but I would warn against using JSONSlurper in some cases as it doesn't maintain ORDER in lists when parsing JSON. This is a known BUG. But there is a simple solution; JSONSlurper parses into a org.json.JSONObjectand as such, you can easily parse your JSON by simply using JSONObject(text) to parse your text Owen Rubel oru...@gmail.com On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 4:10 AM Tommy Svensson <to...@natusoft.se> wrote: Hello Groovy people, I have code using org.apache.groovy:groovy:4.0.1 and it builds without any problems. But now I want to use the JSONSlurper and it looks like there is a new JSONParser also. That however requires groovy-all from googling. The problem is that there seem to be not groovy-all for version 4.0.1. Maven completely fails when I add "-all" to "groovy" in my poms. It will not download the groovy-all file. I deleted ~/.m2/repository and built again and it downloaded all but groovy-all. The JSON stuff is not available in the "groovy" artifact. So my question really is, I want to use Groovys JSON features, what do I need to do to accomplish that ? I've completely failed top find any Groovy 4.0 related page other than the release notes. Since there are big diffs between versions there must be some page for each version I assume ? I found this: https://groovy-lang.org/processing-json.html but it is not version specific and provides no information on how to get access to it. I'm frustrated. Something seemingly simple turned out to be the opposite! Any help is appreciated. Thanks, Tommy Svensson
