Hi Paul, Thanks, but after the warning that JSONSlurper can loose order in lists, a known bug, I decided to go with Jackson Jr, which also allows me to parse JSON into a Map structure. But since I'm coding entirely in Groovy using Groovys JSON support would make sense, but the pointed out bug scared me away :-). I have used Jackson Jr before, it works well.
/Tommy Från: Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> Svara: users@groovy.apache.org <users@groovy.apache.org>, pa...@asert.com.au <pa...@asert.com.au> Datum: 10 juli 2022 at 16:20:43 Till: users@groovy.apache.org <users@groovy.apache.org> Ämne: Re: Using Groovy 4.0.1 and want to use Groovys JsonSlurper or whatever it might be called in version 4. Hi Tommy, I wrote a little blog post that might have some of the information you were missing: https://blogs.apache.org/groovy/entry/parsing-json-with-groovy Perhaps some more of that info belongs in the official documentation. Cheers, Paul. On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 9:10 PM Tommy Svensson <to...@natusoft.se> wrote: > > Hello Groovy people, > > I have code using org.apache.groovy:groovy:4.0.1 and it builds without any > problems. > > But now I want to use the JSONSlurper and it looks like there is a new > JSONParser also. That however requires groovy-all from googling. The problem > is that there seem to be not groovy-all for version 4.0.1. Maven completely > fails when I add "-all" to "groovy" in my poms. It will not download the > groovy-all file. I deleted ~/.m2/repository and built again and it downloaded > all but groovy-all. > > The JSON stuff is not available in the "groovy" artifact. > > So my question really is, I want to use Groovys JSON features, what do I need > to do to accomplish that ? > > I've completely failed top find any Groovy 4.0 related page other than the > release notes. Since there are big diffs between versions there must be some > page for each version I assume ? > > I found this: https://groovy-lang.org/processing-json.html but it is not > version specific and provides no information on how to get access to it. > > I'm frustrated. Something seemingly simple turned out to be the opposite! > > Any help is appreciated. > > Thanks, > Tommy Svensson > > >
