> AFAIK, there's no reason why you can't do IPv6 NAT, and in fact, some
> security policies may well require it.
ah, the nat provides security fantasy again. has it really been six months
already?
if the world thinks your name is carl, but your family calls you mary, a
public attack on carl still gets you. do not confuse address translation
with firewalls, filters, ... despite them often being sold together in the
ipv4 world.
randy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The IPv6 Users Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
