Hi, On 6/28/06, Vijay Pandey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--------------------------------------------------------------- it's a good practice to share a single anonymous session for read only access if possible, it would reduce the time that write actions will take. ----------------------------------------------------------------
it's not thread safe, I think you should pool the connections somehow. btw, I think that comment is out of date, I'll remove it. AFAIK it's been a while since transient items are shared among read only sessions. br, edgar
Does it mean to say that 'session' is thread safe at method level for read only operations , or do we have to synchronize the call on session? or do you think should we have a pool of read only sessions ? Thanks Vijay
