What would be useful is feedback - I haven't heard much from anyone.
In particular, whether the pure RDF to JSON-LD synatx produces something
a normal web dev would relate to.
(The prefixes to 'context isn't done IIRC)
We're approaching a jena release. It is important this release happens
soon.
At the moment, this isn't in it. It does introduce some new
dependencies so the legal-stuff needs doing but it *might* just be
possible to get it in. If feedback were forth coming ... hint hint ...
Andy
On 05/09/13 15:50, Olivier Rossel wrote:
sounds great indeed.
fyi, i also have a n3->json converter somewhere, that works surprisingly
well in those cases.
(n3 is sent on the wire, and client side regenerates the corresponding
*graph* structure as javascript objects).
PS: btw, did the JSON-LD make their "graphify()" function available in
their JS lib?
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Adrian Gschwend <[email protected]> wrote:
On 21.07.13 15:38, Andy Seaborne wrote:
Hi guys,
Joachim brings up an issue that I've seen several times now - not
everything is table shaped - and CONSTRUCT is one way to address that.
was just running into the same issue today, I want to make the
DESCRIBE/CONSTRUCT queries available to classical web developers and
JSON-LD seems to be the way to go now.
The only things missing are adding in the JSON_LD module and updating
Fuseki's content negotiation.
sounds great, any progress on that one?
regards
Adrian
