On 05.09.13 22:05, Andy Seaborne wrote: > In particular, whether the pure RDF to JSON-LD synatx produces something > a normal web dev would relate to.
good point, I'm just trying to understand that too (will post to their list as I don't get it yet). IMHO json-ld is only useful if everything is "prefixed", otherwise we can directly work with application/rdf+json as it looks pretty much the same (to me at least). IIRC a CONSTRUCT query in Fuseki will use PREFIXes defined and when text/turtle is requested return a "shrinked" file, which is very readable (by the way would that be true for DESCRIBE as well?). So my proposal/wish would be that if no PREFIXes are defined, you get the basic json-ld view (not sure how they call this one) for application/ld+json and if we do have PREFIXes, we return a "compacted" form using @context for all the prefixes. But then again maybe I just didn't get json-ld yet :) > We're approaching a jena release. It is important this release happens > soon. > > At the moment, this isn't in it. It does introduce some new > dependencies so the legal-stuff needs doing but it *might* just be > possible to get it in. If feedback were forth coming ... hint hint ... It would be great IMHO because right now it's pretty much impossible to get directly json-ld from a triplestore. In fact I want to create a sample output from my platform as I have to convince some webdevs in two weeks at a conference. regards Adrian
