It names the secured graph.  Yes the same graph can be named two different
things.

On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote:

> Does it name the Graph or the SecuredGraph?  looks like the latter to me -
> which makes sense to me if the same graph may in two SecuredGraphs for
> different setups.
>
>         Andy
>
>
> On 06/08/15 14:28, Claude Warren wrote:
>
>> The permissions code has the requirement that a graph be named, but it
>> does
>> not store the name in the graph object.
>>
>> For debugging, you could wrap graphs with a delegating graph
>> implementation
>> that contains the graph name.  This would get the functionality you want
>> without modifying graph itself.
>>
>> I have not looked, but is there a way to set the graph "constructor" that
>> is used when calling GraphFactory.createDefaultGraph()?
>>
>> Claude
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Rob Vesse <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I would tend to be against having it as an API feature for several
>>> reasons:
>>>
>>> - Users will assume that this is the one true name of the graph (a graph
>>> could have multiple names)
>>>
>>> - Every special graph potentially needs to have some kind of name (what
>>> would the name of a multi-union be?)
>>>
>>> - RDF 1.1 permits blank nodes as graph names which are almost certainly
>>> unusable outside the context of a specific database so why expose them
>>> (this also means the return type needs to be Node not String)
>>>
>>> - What about systems that don't support named graphs (I guess you return
>>> null but then you get users blindly running into NPEs they weren't
>>> expecting)
>>>
>>> - Is the graph name immutable?  If yes then you could get unexpected
>>> behaviour as follows:
>>>
>>> Graph orig = new Graph("urn:foo");
>>> Node name = NodeFactory.createURI("urn:bar");
>>> dsg.addGraph(name, orig);
>>>
>>> Graph retrieved = dsg.getGraph(name);
>>> System.out.println(retrieved.getName());
>>>
>>> Should that return urn:foo or urn:bar, or should it have returned nothing
>>> and actually stored the graph under urn:foo?
>>>
>>> Also having built an API where graphs had a name field on them I can say
>>> that it caused far more problems than it ever solved and I would be
>>> reluctant to introduce it to Jena.  Note that most of the problems were
>>> around the way assumptions about how the name field was used leached into
>>> the rest of the API, the above code example is one place where
>>> introducing
>>> such a field immediately has potential for confusion.
>>>
>>> Rob
>>>
>>> On 06/08/2015 09:39, "Holger Knublauch" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes I can do that. I was wondering whether others have the same
>>>> requirement, so that it becomes a general API feature.
>>>>
>>>> Holger
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 8/6/2015 18:31, Rob Vesse wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Is there any reason why you can't just create your own wrapper class
>>>>> NamedGraph which would hold the extra information and simply place your
>>>>> actual Graph instances inside these wrappers with the desired names
>>>>> attached?
>>>>>
>>>>> Rob
>>>>>
>>>>> On 06/08/2015 03:04, "Holger Knublauch" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> toString would be sufficient, but there needs to be a way to set this
>>>>>> name when the graph is created. Doesn't need to be persisted, and
>>>>>> would
>>>>>> be sufficient for memory graphs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Holger
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/6/2015 10:46, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Since this is essentially about debugging, would it suffice to
>>>>>>> require
>>>>>>> Graph implementations to provide something in toString() to uniquely
>>>>>>> identify themselves, or do you really require user-settable or
>>>>>>> -accessible labels?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> A. Soroka
>>>>>>> The University of Virginia Library
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Aug 5, 2015, at 8:35 PM, Holger Knublauch <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> While debugging I often run into cases where I walk through Graph
>>>>>>>> objects (esp MultiUnions) and don't really know which graphs they
>>>>>>>> are.
>>>>>>>> Looking at triples is often not sufficient. I wonder whether the
>>>>>>>> Graph
>>>>>>>> interface (or at least GraphMem etc) could be extended with a String
>>>>>>>> name field that could be set to identify the graph. Then people
>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>> place a backward link to the graph name (or even just a comment)
>>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>> the Graph object itself upon creation. I welcome other suggestions
>>>>>>>> too,
>>>>>>>> or maybe I am the only one who would find that useful?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Holger
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web
<http://like-like.xenei.com>
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren

Reply via email to