You should start a new thread instead of adding to an unrelated one. On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 2:20 AM, Neda Alipanah <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello there, > I have a quick question. I am loading a 25 Meg Owl file to the memory > using the following commands. My code is working fine through the > IDE(IntelliJ), but when I create a runnable Jar, it does not find the file. > I already put the owl file directory in the class path but I get Exception > In Initializer error. > > // Create an empty model > model = ModelFactory.createOntologyModel(OntModelSpec.OWL_DL_MEM); > > // Use the FileManager to find the input file > InputStream in = FileManager.get().open(inPath); > > [image: Inline image 1] > > Really appreciate if you can provide a solution for the problem. > > > Best Regards, > > Neda > > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 6:52 AM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yes, there is a difference. >> >> It (the join) happens just before project and after any GROUP BY. >> >> See the algebra at http://www.sparql.org/query-validator.html >> >> Andy >> >> >> On 21/11/17 14:46, Claude Warren wrote: >> >>> based on https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#inline-data-examples >>> >>> there is no difference between values blocks inside or outside a graph >>> pattern. >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Claude Warren <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Currently the values are always placed in the top level of the query. >>>> >>>> Q: does it make a difference to exeuction? (I suspect it does but I >>>> want >>>> to make sure before I proceed to add a method to place it inside the >>>> graph >>>> pattern. >>>> >>>> Claude >>>> >>>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Rob Vesse <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> The output you get is syntactically valid - VALUES is allowed at the top >>>>> level of the query as well as within graph patterns >>>>> >>>>> It is not clear to me if the latter this Is actually possible with >>>>> the >>>>> current query builder, Claude can probably give you a more detailed >>>>> answer >>>>> >>>>> Rob >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 21/11/2017, 12:05, "Chris Dollin" <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Dear All >>>>> >>>>> I'm missing something with use of the query builder to create >>>>> VALUES >>>>> clauses. >>>>> The code >>>>> >>>>> @Test public void buildValues() { >>>>> SelectBuilder sb = new SelectBuilder(); >>>>> sb.addValueVar("item", "spoo", "flarn"); >>>>> System.err.println(sb.buildString()); >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> generates >>>>> >>>>> SELECT * >>>>> WHERE >>>>> { } >>>>> VALUES ?item { "spoo" "flarn" } >>>>> >>>>> which I believe to be syntactically incorrect but in any case I >>>>> want >>>>> the >>>>> generated VALUES clause to be inside the WHERE {} ie >>>>> >>>>> SELECT * WHERE {VALUES ?item {"spoo" "flarn"}}} >>>>> >>>>> What should I be doing and how should I have known that? >>>>> >>>>> Chris >>>>> >>>>> PS please to excuse the misuse of @Test here ... exploratory use >>>>> only. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> "What I don't understand is this ..." Trevor Chaplin, /The >>>>> Beiderbeck >>>>> Affair/ >>>>> >>>>> Epimorphics Ltd, http://www.epimorphics.com >>>>> Registered address: Court Lodge, 105 High Street, Portishead, >>>>> Bristol >>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=105+High+Street,+Portishead,+Bristol+%0D+BS20+%0D+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A06PT&entry=gmail&source=g> >>>>> BS20 >>>>> 6PT >>>>> Epimorphics Ltd. is a limited company registered in England >>>>> (number >>>>> 7016688) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web >>>> <http://like-like.xenei.com> >>>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >
