you are missing the text index in the assembler.

On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 12:08 PM Jean-Marc Vanel <jeanmarc.va...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Yes indeed,
> exactly with this assembler file:
>
> https://github.com/jmvanel/semantic_forms/blob/master/scala/jena.spatial.assembler.ttl
>
> And, when the Jena based application is started with this same assembler
> file, the spatial queries work , as said above in this thread.
>
>
> Le dim. 16 déc. 2018 à 12:18, Marco Neumann <marco.neum...@gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
> > did you create the text index with jena.textindexer
> > --desc=/<path>/config.ttl?
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 8:48 AM Jean-Marc Vanel <
> jeanmarc.va...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I fixed a stupid error in text index URI, resulting from pasting, in
> new
> > > file jena.spatial+text.assembler.ttl:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/jmvanel/semantic_forms/blob/master/scala/jena.spatial%2Btext.assembler.ttl
> > >
> > > Now, it reads:
> > > :spatial_dataset rdf:type     spatial:SpatialDataset ;
> > >     rdf:type     text:TextDataset ;
> > >     spatial:dataset   <#dataset> ;
> > >     spatial:index     <#indexLucene> ;
> > >     text:dataset   <#dataset> ;
> > >     text:index    * <#indexLuceneText>* ;
> > >     .
> > >
> > > But still it says "Failed to find the text index" .
> > >
> > >
> > > Le dim. 16 déc. 2018 à 09:34, Jean-Marc Vanel <
> jeanmarc.va...@gmail.com>
> > a
> > > écrit :
> > >
> > > > So I tried a new  file jena.spatial+text.assembler.ttl with separate
> > > > Lucene indices for spatial and text:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/jmvanel/semantic_forms/blob/master/scala/jena.spatial%2Btext.assembler.ttl
> > > >
> > > > It defines a Dataset with both Dataset types and both Lucene indices:
> > > >
> > > > :spatial_dataset rdf:type     spatial:SpatialDataset ;
> > > >     rdf:type     text:TextDataset ;
> > > >     spatial:dataset   <#dataset> ;
> > > >     spatial:index     <#indexLucene> ;
> > > >     text:dataset   <#dataset> ;
> > > >     text:index     <#indexLucene> ;
> > > >     .
> > > >
> > > > Alas , when querying , it says "Failed to find the text index" :
> > > >
> > > > WARN  org.apache.jena.query.text.TextQueryPF - Failed to find the
> text
> > > > index : tried context and as a text-enabled dataset
> > > > WARN  org.apache.jena.query.text.TextQueryPF - No text index - no
> text
> > > > search performed
> > > >
> > > > Is it because rdf:type spatial:SpatialDataset is asserted first in
> > > > assembler file?
> > > > So, defining a hybrid Dataset does not work anymore by TTL
> > specification
> > > > than by JVM code specification.
> > > > I definitely need more experts' advice .
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Le sam. 15 déc. 2018 à 21:10, ajs6f <aj...@apache.org> a écrit :
> > > >
> > > >> > On Dec 15, 2018, at 9:59 AM, Marco Neumann <
> marco.neum...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >> *Question*: does that make sense to have a unique Lucene index
> for
> > > >> text and
> > > >> >> space ?
> > > >> >> It is possible at all? If yes, is it good in terms of disk space
> > and
> > > >> >> performance?
> > > >> >> Like this:
> > > >> >> <#indexLucene> a text:TextIndexLucene ;
> > > >> >>               a spatial:SpatialIndexLucene ;
> > > >> >>               # etc ...
> > > >>
> > > >> I'm sure that would be ideal for many cases, but I'm not at all sure
> > > that
> > > >> the same index can answer queries of both kinds. Perhaps we can
> > combine
> > > >> fields from both, but are the relationships between tuple and index
> > > record
> > > >> the same in both cases?
> > > >>
> > > >> Otherwise, I know we had a conversation at some point in the past on
> > one
> > > >> of the lists about trying to factor out commonalities between
> > > jena-spatial
> > > >> and jena-text, but it didn't go very far at that time and I don't
> know
> > > what
> > > >> the intervening years have done to make it more or less feasible.
> > There
> > > >> have been many changes to jena-text in that time and the new spatial
> > > module
> > > >> is a whole new story. I'd put a link here but searching
> > > lists.apache.org
> > > >> hasn't brought it up for me.
> > > >>
> > > >> ajs6f
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Jean-Marc Vanel
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.semantic-forms.cc:9111/display?displayuri=http://jmvanel.free.fr/jmv.rdf%23me#subject
> > > > <
> > >
> >
> http://www.semantic-forms.cc:9111/display?displayuri=http://jmvanel.free.fr/jmv.rdf%23me
> > > >
> > > > Rule-based programming, Semantic Web
> > > > +33 (0)6 89 16 29 52
> > > > Twitter: @jmvanel , @jmvanel_fr ; chat: irc://
> > irc.freenode.net#eulergui
> > > >  Chroniques jardin
> > > > <
> > >
> >
> http://semantic-forms.cc:1952/backlinks?q=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FChronicle
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jean-Marc Vanel
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.semantic-forms.cc:9111/display?displayuri=http://jmvanel.free.fr/jmv.rdf%23me#subject
> > > <
> > >
> >
> http://www.semantic-forms.cc:9111/display?displayuri=http://jmvanel.free.fr/jmv.rdf%23me
> > > >
> > > Rule-based programming, Semantic Web
> > > +33 (0)6 89 16 29 52
> > > Twitter: @jmvanel , @jmvanel_fr ; chat: irc://
> irc.freenode.net#eulergui
> > >  Chroniques jardin
> > > <
> > >
> >
> http://semantic-forms.cc:1952/backlinks?q=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FChronicle
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Marco Neumann
> > KONA
> >
>
>
> --
> Jean-Marc Vanel
>
> http://www.semantic-forms.cc:9111/display?displayuri=http://jmvanel.free.fr/jmv.rdf%23me#subject
> <
> http://www.semantic-forms.cc:9111/display?displayuri=http://jmvanel.free.fr/jmv.rdf%23me
> >
> Rule-based programming, Semantic Web
> +33 (0)6 89 16 29 52
> Twitter: @jmvanel , @jmvanel_fr ; chat: irc://irc.freenode.net#eulergui
>  Chroniques jardin
> <
> http://semantic-forms.cc:1952/backlinks?q=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FChronicle
> >
>


-- 


---
Marco Neumann
KONA

Reply via email to