Hi Nikos Out of curiosity can you go into more detail regarding what hardware you were running and your setup for MySql? Were you using Innodb or MyIsam. If you were using Innodb did you make any other configuration changes to MySql to accommodate Innodb.
>From the user guide it is implied that the bottle neck for Kannel is the number of messages that the SMSC can accommodate per second. Is this still the case? Regards, 2010/8/8 Nikos Balkanas <[email protected]> > Hi, > > I have run some benchmarking for a client using fakesmpp. Using the default > service for MO's I got: > > MO's: 1400 SMS/s > MT + DLRs (internal): 747 SMS/s > MT + DLRs (MySql): 434 SMS/s > > BR, > Nikos > ----- Original Message ----- From: [email protected] > To: kannel users > Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2010 4:22 PM > Subject: Kannel performance benchmarking > > > > Hi, > > > I am interested to know about the kannel performance benchmarking, > especially in terms of speed (msgs/sec), MO or MT. I assume that multiple > smsboxes does not have any effect over kannel performance, since the > front-end talking to SMSC is the main bearerbox. What is the max speed that > could be attained by kannel and/or bearerbox? > > > Regards, > > > Hamza > >
