Try valgrind in linux.
BR,
Nikos
----- Original Message -----
From: "sangprabv" <sangpr...@gmail.com>
To: "Nikos Balkanas" <nbalka...@gmail.com>
Cc: "brett skinner" <tatty.dishcl...@gmail.com>; "kannel users"
<users@kannel.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 3:35 AM
Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
Yeah I understand that. But when the there is no traffic. Kannel doesn't
release the cached or buffered memory it used. Do you have any solution?
What command to list down or trace the memory usage by Kannel? So maybe we
can investigate which function or module in Kannel is eating the memory.
Thanks
sangprabv
sangpr...@gmail.com
http://www.petitiononline.com/froyo/
On Aug 9, 2010, at 11:19 PM, Nikos Balkanas wrote:
No memory problems. It is reasonable that kannel will use more memory in
higher traffic, since all queues are in memory, as long as it drops to
nominal levels once the traffic is gone.
BR,
Nikos
----- Original Message ----- From: sangprabv
To: brett skinner
Cc: Nikos Balkanas ; kannel users
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
Hi Nikos,
Do you experience memory problem? In my case Kannel is eating the memory
on high load traffics. I always need to restart the box to get more
memory. I even give 3 on /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches but still Kannel eat the
memory :(
sangprabv
sangpr...@gmail.com
http://www.petitiononline.com/froyo/
On Aug 9, 2010, at 9:42 PM, brett skinner wrote:
Hi Nikos
Out of curiosity can you go into more detail regarding what hardware you
were running and your setup for MySql? Were you using Innodb or MyIsam. If
you were using Innodb did you make any other configuration changes to
MySql to accommodate Innodb.
From the user guide it is implied that the bottle neck for Kannel is the
number of messages that the SMSC can accommodate per second. Is this still
the case?
Regards,
2010/8/8 Nikos Balkanas <nbalka...@gmail.com>
Hi,
I have run some benchmarking for a client using fakesmpp. Using the
default service for MO's I got:
MO's: 1400 SMS/s
MT + DLRs (internal): 747 SMS/s
MT + DLRs (MySql): 434 SMS/s
BR,
Nikos
----- Original Message ----- From: ha...@aeon.pk
To: kannel users
Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2010 4:22 PM
Subject: Kannel performance benchmarking
Hi,
I am interested to know about the kannel performance benchmarking,
especially in terms of speed (msgs/sec), MO or MT. I assume that multiple
smsboxes does not have any effect over kannel performance, since the
front-end talking to SMSC is the main bearerbox. What is the max speed
that could be attained by kannel and/or bearerbox?
Regards,
Hamza
