Hi Nikos, Do you experience memory problem? In my case Kannel is eating the memory on high load traffics. I always need to restart the box to get more memory. I even give 3 on /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches but still Kannel eat the memory :(
sangprabv [email protected] http://www.petitiononline.com/froyo/ On Aug 9, 2010, at 9:42 PM, brett skinner wrote: > Hi Nikos > > Out of curiosity can you go into more detail regarding what hardware you were > running and your setup for MySql? Were you using Innodb or MyIsam. If you > were using Innodb did you make any other configuration changes to MySql to > accommodate Innodb. > > From the user guide it is implied that the bottle neck for Kannel is the > number of messages that the SMSC can accommodate per second. Is this still > the case? > > Regards, > > 2010/8/8 Nikos Balkanas <[email protected]> > Hi, > > I have run some benchmarking for a client using fakesmpp. Using the default > service for MO's I got: > > MO's: 1400 SMS/s > MT + DLRs (internal): 747 SMS/s > MT + DLRs (MySql): 434 SMS/s > > BR, > Nikos > ----- Original Message ----- From: [email protected] > To: kannel users > Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2010 4:22 PM > Subject: Kannel performance benchmarking > > > > Hi, > > > I am interested to know about the kannel performance benchmarking, especially > in terms of speed (msgs/sec), MO or MT. I assume that multiple smsboxes does > not have any effect over kannel performance, since the front-end talking to > SMSC is the main bearerbox. What is the max speed that could be attained by > kannel and/or bearerbox? > > > Regards, > > > Hamza > >
