Not the same id. Each part has its own SMSC message_id

On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Alejandro Guerrieri
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes. I wouldn't call it a bug, it was a design decision. Of course you're
> absolutely entitled to disagree with it and change it on your local tree, as
> you already did :)
> Now, the issue is, since you define one dlr-url (probably with a unique id
> you created) and Kannel splits the message into 2 or 3 parts, you'd get 2 or
> 3 hits on that URL, sharing the same id. Are you sure that that's what you
> want?
> Regards,
> Alex
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Ivan Kurnosov <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Actually, I can ;-) I already fixed kannel (to be clear - i've just
>> commented 3 lines of code) to send only one DLR msg. So now I get N
>> delivery messages.
>>
>> But I'm very curious - is it just kannel "feature" or some smpp
>> specification mandatory? I've asked this question because one of my
>> SMSC (currently i'm working with 3 different companies) does not send
>> me delivery messages if it is 0x1 just at first and not at second
>> message. So I need to know whether I need to ask their support to
>> reconfigure SMSC or make some tricks to get that info
>>
>> 2010/9/15 Nikos Balkanas <[email protected]>:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > This is a known kannel limitation. In a multpart SMS it will request DLR
>> > only for the first part. Nothing you can do about it.
>> >
>> > BR,
>> > Nikos
>> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ivan Kurnosov" <[email protected]>
>> > To: <[email protected]>
>> > Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 8:28 AM
>> > Subject: registered_delivery and multi-parts message
>> >
>> >
>> >> Hello there.
>> >>
>> >> Why does
>> >>
>> >> 2010-09-15 16:26:32 [25217] [6] DEBUG:   registered_delivery: 0 =
>> >> 0x00000000
>> >>
>> >> for second part even though it was 0x1 for first one?
>> >>
>> >> Is not it a bug?
>> >>
>> >> While reading SMPP v3.4 specification I did not see any
>> >> recommendations about how to set registered_delivery if there are
>> >> multiple parts.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> With best regards, Ivan Kurnosov
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> With best regards, Ivan Kurnosov
>>
>
>



-- 
With best regards, Ivan Kurnosov

Reply via email to