Hmmmm.... I'm talking about %F which is foreign id and as I said -
when it is multipart short message - I get it == 0 at my dlr-url

On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Rene Kluwen <[email protected]> wrote:
> You guys are talking about different id's.
>
> Smsc id (foreign id) is not the same id as you assign in dlr-url.
>
> == Rene
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> Of Ivan Kurnosov
> Sent: Wednesday, 15 September, 2010 23:58
> To: Alejandro Guerrieri; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: registered_delivery and multi-parts message
>
> Not the same id. Each part has its own SMSC message_id
>
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Alejandro Guerrieri
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Yes. I wouldn't call it a bug, it was a design decision. Of course you're
>> absolutely entitled to disagree with it and change it on your local tree,
> as
>> you already did :)
>> Now, the issue is, since you define one dlr-url (probably with a unique id
>> you created) and Kannel splits the message into 2 or 3 parts, you'd get 2
> or
>> 3 hits on that URL, sharing the same id. Are you sure that that's what you
>> want?
>> Regards,
>> Alex
>> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Ivan Kurnosov <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Actually, I can ;-) I already fixed kannel (to be clear - i've just
>>> commented 3 lines of code) to send only one DLR msg. So now I get N
>>> delivery messages.
>>>
>>> But I'm very curious - is it just kannel "feature" or some smpp
>>> specification mandatory? I've asked this question because one of my
>>> SMSC (currently i'm working with 3 different companies) does not send
>>> me delivery messages if it is 0x1 just at first and not at second
>>> message. So I need to know whether I need to ask their support to
>>> reconfigure SMSC or make some tricks to get that info
>>>
>>> 2010/9/15 Nikos Balkanas <[email protected]>:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > This is a known kannel limitation. In a multpart SMS it will request
> DLR
>>> > only for the first part. Nothing you can do about it.
>>> >
>>> > BR,
>>> > Nikos
>>> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ivan Kurnosov" <[email protected]>
>>> > To: <[email protected]>
>>> > Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 8:28 AM
>>> > Subject: registered_delivery and multi-parts message
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >> Hello there.
>>> >>
>>> >> Why does
>>> >>
>>> >> 2010-09-15 16:26:32 [25217] [6] DEBUG:   registered_delivery: 0 =
>>> >> 0x00000000
>>> >>
>>> >> for second part even though it was 0x1 for first one?
>>> >>
>>> >> Is not it a bug?
>>> >>
>>> >> While reading SMPP v3.4 specification I did not see any
>>> >> recommendations about how to set registered_delivery if there are
>>> >> multiple parts.
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> With best regards, Ivan Kurnosov
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> With best regards, Ivan Kurnosov
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> With best regards, Ivan Kurnosov
>
>
>
>



-- 
With best regards, Ivan Kurnosov

Reply via email to