> 
> > On 17 Oct 2023, at 21:16, Patrick Dupre via users 
> > <users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > If I make a rpm -qa, I got
> > 
> > xconsole-1.0.7-2.fc34.x86_64
> > nautilus-sendto-3.8.6-8.fc32.x86_64
> 
> These are very old packages that are, I think, signed by keys that are
> no longer supported because they are not secure.
> 

I do not think so, I removed nautilus-sendto-3.8.6-8.fc32.x86_64
and same thing appears.
On one machine
rpm -qa xpr 
xpr-1.0.5-2.fc34.x86_64
One the other machine, the same command

xpr-1.0.5-2.fc34.x86_64
--More--error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h#     132
Header RSA signature: BAD (header tag 268: invalid OpenPGP signature: Parsing 
an OpenPGP packet:
Failed to parse Signature Packet
    because: Signature appears to be created by a non-conformant OpenPGP 
implementation, see 
<https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2351>.
    because: Malformed MPI: leading bit is not set: expected bit 8 to be set in 
  101000 (28))
 Header SHA1 digest: OK

> > error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h#     134
> > Header RSA signature: BAD (header tag 268: invalid OpenPGP signature: 
> > Parsing an OpenPGP packet:
> >  Failed to parse Signature Packet
> >      because: Signature appears to be created by a non-conformant OpenPGP 
> > implementation, see 
> > <https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2351>.
> >      because: Malformed MPI: leading bit is not set: expected bit 8 to be 
> > set in  1111100 (7c))
> > Header SHA1 digest: OK
> > error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h#     137
> > Header RSA signature: BAD (header tag 268: invalid OpenPGP signature: 
> > Parsing an OpenPGP packet:
> >  Failed to parse Signature Packet
> >      because: Signature appears to be created by a non-conformant OpenPGP 
> > implementation, see 
> > <https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2351>.
> >      because: Malformed MPI: leading bit is not set: expected bit 8 to be 
> > set in    10011 (13))
> > Header SHA1 digest: OK
> > error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h#     138
> > Header RSA signature: BAD (header tag 268: invalid OpenPGP signature: 
> > Parsing an OpenPGP packet:
> >  Failed to parse Signature Packet
> >      because: Signature appears to be created by a non-conformant OpenPGP 
> > implementation, see 
> > <https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2351>.
> >      because: Malformed MPI: leading bit is not set: expected bit 8 to be 
> > set in   101101 (2d))
> > Header SHA1 digest: OK
> > error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h#     140
> > Header RSA signature: BAD (header tag 268: invalid OpenPGP signature: 
> > Parsing an OpenPGP packet:
> >  Failed to parse Signature Packet
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Can I void these errors?
> 
> Yes remove the very old packages. Can you install f38 versions of them?
> 
> Barry
> 
> > ===========================================================================
> > Patrick DUPRÉ                                 | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
> > ===========================================================================
> > _______________________________________________
> > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives: 
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
> 
>
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to