On 10/25/23 13:35, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
rpm -qi $(rpm -qa | grep pubkey) error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 132 Header RSA signature: BAD (header tag 268: invalid OpenPGP signature: Parsing an OpenPGP packet: Failed to parse Signature Packet because: Signature appears to be created by a non-conformant OpenPGP implementation, see <https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2351>. because: Malformed MPI: leading bit is not set: expected bit 8 to be set in 101000 (28)) Header SHA1 digest: OK error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 134 Header RSA signature: BAD (header tag 268: invalid OpenPGP signature: Parsing an OpenPGP packet: Failed to parse Signature Packet because: Signature appears to be created by a non-conformant OpenPGP implementation, see <https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2351>. because: Malformed MPI: leading bit is not set: expected bit 8 to be set in 1111100 (7c)) Header SHA1 digest: OK error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 137How can I associate the pubkeys with the package?
They aren't part of a package. They are independent data items. I'm not sure if it's a pubkey or a package.
Should I rebuild the rpm databasis?
That won't do anything. The database is fine, it's the signature of something in it that isn't.
Try running "rpm -qa --nosignature | grep pubkey" and see if that runs without the error. That option isn't documented for querying, so I don't know if it will have any effect.
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
