> I am not saying Seo's choice of license was a bad one, but I don't know > if it has a value by itself that's all. The question is not to please > people but to convey the correct rights as well as the responsability > you take as the provide for the piece of software. The MIT license is as > easy to understand and does just that IMO ;)
Mind you it seems some people believe the public domain license such as the MIT one is actually not a license: http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/6225 via http://programming.reddit.com/info/k9kl/comments - Sylvain _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
