"If you want to give away software for any use whatsoever, use a simple license such as the MIT license."
So yes, the MIT license and similar *are* actually licenses.
Not to mention less crude than dropping the F-bomb, which was originally the point I was trying to make. The fact that even if elegantly worded the "DWTFYW" 'license' may not be a good one is a good issue to raise. Keep in mind, though, that the author of the license doesn't seem to be a resident of the US, so none of the above may be applicable.
On 9/30/06, Sylvain Hellegouarch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mind you it seems some people believe the public domain license such as
the MIT one is actually not a license:
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/6225 via
http://programming.reddit.com/info/k9kl/comments
_______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
