Seo,
That makes sense to me as well. I want to run python unaltered
python scripts on silverlight and (maybe) ironpython without using the
python standard library. It makes sense to use the python standard
library in IronPython as it's there, and you can use it. However this
doesn't make a whole lot of sense in Silverlight for the reasons I
mentioned before, mainly bloat. So I suppose we should just rehash
what functions we need and build them into an identical structure as
found in the standard python libraries?
I hope to hear back from you soon! I'm excited to work on a joint
project.
Regards,
Ken
On Oct 29, 2008, at 2:19 AM, Seo Sanghyeon wrote:
2008/10/29 Kenneth Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
How would these modules be structured, I'd simply just recreate
what we need
out of the standard library using .NETs classes. So for instance
for os.path
i'd literally write a new module. I've got the pure python
implementation of
elementtree along PDIS-XPATH for xpath operations. I've written a few
modules here:
http://github.com/xkenneth/gpath/tree/master
http://github.com/xkenneth/gxml/tree/master
Okay, here is my take on how clipath would be structured:
http://www.bitbucket.org/sanxiyn/clipath/
--
Seo Sanghyeon
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.ironpython.com
http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.ironpython.com
http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
