...and here's a reference to the original thread http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg08978.html
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Curt Hagenlocher <[email protected]>wrote: > I believe this was fixed for 2.6, but that the fix is too disruptive to > backport (by a long shot!) > > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Michael Foord > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Issue 22239 has been closed as 'by design'. >> >> >> http://ironpython.codeplex.com/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=22239&ProjectName=IronPython >> >> Dino described this as a serious bug when it was pointed out and it is >> both extremely unintuitive and problematic - why should separate scopes >> (modules) be linked this way when used from the hosting API? >> >> This seems like a very odd decision. >> >> All the best, >> >> Michael Foord >> >> -- >> http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/ >> http://www.voidspace.org.uk/blog >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com >> > >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
