Afraid I can't help you - I've never seen that behavior on any system, can't 
replicate it anywhere, and have no idea what might cause it.

On Apr 18, 2010, at 9:15 AM, Mario Ogrizek wrote:

> It is a parallel tools platform for eclipse IDE, a plugin.
> I dont think it is a source of problem.
> 
> The same thing is happening running it from shell. It has something to do 
> with mapping or something else. Since it allways maps for job 0, what ever 
> that means.
> 
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
> Again, what is PTP?
> 
> I can't replicate this on any system we can access, so it may be something 
> about this PTP thing.
> 
> On Apr 18, 2010, at 1:37 AM, Mario Ogrizek wrote:
> 
>> Ofcourse i checked that, i have all of this things, 
>> I simplified the program, and its the same.
>> Nothing gave me clue, except the more detailed writeout of the PTP.
>> Here is the critical part of it:
>> (1.2 one, this is correct)
>> [Mario.local:05548]  Map for job: 1  Generated by mapping mode: byslot
>>      Starting vpid: 0        Vpid range: 4   Num app_contexts: 1
>> ...
>> ...
>> 
>> (1.4 one)
>> [Mario.local:05542]  Map for job: 0  Generated by mapping mode: byslot
>>      Starting vpid: 0        Vpid range: 1   Num app_contexts: 1
>> ...
>> ...
>> 
>> Seems the 1.4 mapps the wrong job, Im not sure to what is it referred to, 
>> but hope it will give you some clues.
>>  
>> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 4:07 AM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
>> Just to check what is going on, why don't you remove that message passing 
>> code and just
>> 
>> printf("Hello MPI World from process %d!", my_rank
>> 
>>  in each process? Much more direct - avoids any ambiguity.
>> 
>> Also, be certain that you compile this program for the specific OMPI version 
>> you are running it under. OMPI is NOT binary compatible across releases - 
>> you have to recompile the program for the specific release you are going to 
>> use.
>> 
>> 
>> On Apr 17, 2010, at 4:52 PM, Mario Ogrizek wrote:
>> 
>>> Ofcourse, its the same program, wasnt recompiled for a week.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> #include <stdio.h>
>>> #include <string.h>
>>> #include "mpi.h"
>>> 
>>> int main(int argc, char* argv[]){
>>>     int  my_rank; /* rank of process */
>>>     int  p;       /* number of processes */
>>>     int source;   /* rank of sender */
>>>     int dest;     /* rank of receiver */
>>>     int tag=0;    /* tag for messages */
>>>     char message[100];        /* storage for message */
>>>     MPI_Status status ;   /* return status for receive */
>>>     
>>>     /* start up MPI */
>>>     
>>>     MPI_Init(&argc, &argv);
>>> 
>>>     /* find out process rank */
>>>     MPI_Comm_rank(MPI_COMM_WORLD, &my_rank); 
>>>     
>>> 
>>>     /* find out number of processes */
>>>     MPI_Comm_size(MPI_COMM_WORLD, &p);
>>> 
>>>     
>>>     if (my_rank !=0){
>>>             /* create message */
>>>             sprintf(message, "Hello MPI World from process %d!", my_rank);
>>>             dest = 0;
>>>             /* use strlen+1 so that '\0' get transmitted */
>>>             MPI_Send(message, strlen(message)+1, MPI_CHAR,
>>>                dest, tag, MPI_COMM_WORLD);
>>>     }
>>>     else{
>>>             printf("Hello MPI World From process 0: Num processes: %d\n",p);
>>>             for (source = 1; source < p; source++) {
>>>                     MPI_Recv(message, 100, MPI_CHAR, source, tag,
>>>                           MPI_COMM_WORLD, &status);
>>>                     printf("%s\n",message);
>>>             }
>>>     }
>>>     /* shut down MPI */
>>>     MPI_Finalize(); 
>>>     
>>>     
>>>     return 0;
>>> }
>>> 
>>> I triplechecked:
>>> v1.2 output
>>> Hello MPI World From process 0: Num processes: 4
>>> Hello MPI World from process 1!
>>> Hello MPI World from process 2!
>>> Hello MPI World from process 3!
>>> 
>>> v1.4 output:
>>> Hello MPI World From process 0: Num processes: 1
>>> Hello MPI World From process 0: Num processes: 1
>>> Hello MPI World From process 0: Num processes: 1
>>> Hello MPI World From process 0: Num processes: 1
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 9:13 PM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Apr 17, 2010, at 11:17 AM, Mario Ogrizek wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hahaha, ok then that WAS silly! :D
>>>> So there is no way to utilize both cores with mpi?
>>> 
>>> We are using both cores - it is just that they are on the same node. Unless 
>>> told otherwise, the processes will use shared memory for communication.
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Ah well, I'll correct that.
>>>> 
>>>> From console, im starting a job like this: mpirun -np 4 Program, where i 
>>>> want to run a Program on 4 processors.
>>>> I was just stumbled when i got same output 4 times, like there are 4 
>>>> processes ranked 0.
>>>> While with the old version of mpi (1.2) same execution would give 4 
>>>> processes ranked 0..3.
>>> 
>>> And so you should - if not, then there is something wrong. No way mpirun 
>>> would start 4 processes ranked 0. How are you printing the rank? Are you 
>>> sure you are getting it correctly?
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Hope you see my question.
>>>> 
>>>> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On Apr 17, 2010, at 1:16 AM, Mario Ogrizek wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> I am new to mpi, so I'm sorry for any silly questions.
>>>>> 
>>>>> My idea was to try to use dual core machine as two nodes. I have a 
>>>>> limited access to a cluster, so this was just for "testing" purposes.
>>>>> My default hostfile contains usual comments and this two nodes:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> node0
>>>>>> node1
>>>>> I thought that each processor is a node for MPI purpose.
>>>> 
>>>> I'm afraid not - it is just another processor on that node. So you only 
>>>> have one node as far as OMPI is concerned.
>>>> 
>>>>> Im not sure what do you mean with "mpirun cmd line"?
>>>> 
>>>> How are you starting your job? The usual way is with "mpirun -n N ...". 
>>>> That is what we mean by the "mpirun cmd line" - i.e., what command are you 
>>>> using to start your job?
>>>> 
>>>> It sounds like things are actually working correctly. You might look at 
>>>> "mpirun -h" for possible options of interest.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Mario
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 1:54 AM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Apr 16, 2010, at 5:08 PM, Mario Ogrizek wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> I checked the default MCA param file, and found it was there that was 
>>>>>> (automatically) specified as a relative path, so i changed it.
>>>>>> So now, it works, altho, still something is not right.
>>>>>> Seems like its creating 4 times only 1 process.
>>>>>> Not sure if it has to do something with my hostfile, it contains:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> node0
>>>>>> node1
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I am running this on a simple dualcore machine, so i specified it as a 
>>>>>> localhost with two nodes.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I don't understand this comment - a dual core machine would still be a 
>>>>> single node. Just happens to have two processors in it.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Could you send the contents of your hostfile and your mpirun cmd line?
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Mario
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Mario Ogrizek 
>>>>>> <mario.guard...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> I understand, so, its looking for a 
>>>>>> working_dir/usr/local/etc/openmpi-default-hostfile
>>>>>> I managed to run a hello world program from the console, while my wd was 
>>>>>> just "/" and it worked, altho strangely...
>>>>>> example for 4 procs:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hello MPI World From process 0: Num processes: 1
>>>>>> Hello MPI World From process 0: Num processes: 1
>>>>>> Hello MPI World From process 0: Num processes: 1
>>>>>> Hello MPI World From process 0: Num processes: 1
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> So, you are saying i allways have to be in "/" to run mpi programs, or 
>>>>>> there is a way for mpi to search absolute path?
>>>>>> It seems pretty inconvinient this way.
>>>>>> I think v 1.2 didnt have this limitation.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Does this have to do anything with LD_LIBRARY_PATH?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Mario
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
>>>>>> How did you specify it? Command line? Default MCA param file?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Apr 16, 2010, at 11:44 AM, Mario Ogrizek wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Any idea how to solve this?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Timur Magomedov 
>>>>>>> <timur.magome...@developonbox.ru> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hello.
>>>>>>> It looks that you hostfile path should
>>>>>>> be /usr/local/etc/openmpi-default-hostfile not
>>>>>>> usr/local/etc/openmpi-default-hostfile but somehow Open MPI gets the
>>>>>>> second path.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> В Птн, 16/04/2010 в 19:10 +0200, Mario Ogrizek пишет:
>>>>>>> > Well, im not sure why should i name it /openmpi-default-hostfile
>>>>>>> > Especially, because mpirun v1.2 executes without any errors.
>>>>>>> > But, i made a copy named /openmpi-default-hostfile, and still, the
>>>>>>> > same result.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > This is the whole error message for a simple hello world program:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Open RTE was unable to open the hostfile:
>>>>>>> >     usr/local/etc/openmpi-default-hostfile
>>>>>>> > Check to make sure the path and filename are correct.
>>>>>>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> > [Mario.local:04300] [[114,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Not found in file
>>>>>>> > base/ras_base_allocate.c at line 186
>>>>>>> > [Mario.local:04300] [[114,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Not found in file
>>>>>>> > base/plm_base_launch_support.c at line 72
>>>>>>> > [Mario.local:04300] [[114,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Not found in file
>>>>>>> > plm_rsh_module.c at line 990
>>>>>>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> > A daemon (pid unknown) died unexpectedly on signal 1  while attempting
>>>>>>> > to
>>>>>>> > launch so we are aborting.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > There may be more information reported by the environment (see above).
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > This may be because the daemon was unable to find all the needed
>>>>>>> > shared
>>>>>>> > libraries on the remote node. You may set your LD_LIBRARY_PATH to have
>>>>>>> > the
>>>>>>> > location of the shared libraries on the remote nodes and this will
>>>>>>> > automatically be forwarded to the remote nodes.
>>>>>>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> > mpirun noticed that the job aborted, but has no info as to the process
>>>>>>> > that caused that situation.
>>>>>>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> > mpirun: clean termination accomplished
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > ps. PTP is a parallel tools platform plugin for eclipse
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Regards,
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Mario
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> > users mailing list
>>>>>>> > us...@open-mpi.org
>>>>>>> > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>>> Timur Magomedov
>>>>>>> Senior C++ Developer
>>>>>>> DevelopOnBox LLC / Zodiac Interactive
>>>>>>> http://www.zodiac.tv/
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> users mailing list
>>>>>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> users mailing list
>>>>>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> users mailing list
>>>>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> users mailing list
>>>>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> users mailing list
>>>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> users mailing list
>>>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> users mailing list
>>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> users mailing list
>>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> users mailing list
>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> users mailing list
>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> us...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> us...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> us...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> us...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users

Reply via email to