For giggles, try using MPI_STATUS_IGNORE (assuming you don't need to look at 
the status at all).  See if that works for you.

Meaning: I wonder if we're computing the status size for Fortran incorrectly in 
the -i8 case...


On Oct 31, 2013, at 1:58 PM, Jim Parker <jimparker96...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Some additional info that may jog some solutions.  Calls to MPI_SEND do not 
> cause memory corruption.  Only calls to MPI_RECV.  Since the main difference 
> is the fact that MPI_RECV needs a "status" array and SEND does not, seems to 
> indicate to me that something is wrong with status.
>  
> Also, I can run a C version of the helloWorld program with no errors.  
> However, int types are only 4-byte.  To send 8byte integers, I define tempInt 
> as long int and pass MPI_LONG as a type.
>  
> @Jeff,
>   I got a copy of the openmpi conf.log.  See attached.
>  
> Cheers,
> --Jim
> 
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Jim Parker <jimparker96...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, all, where to begin...
> 
> Perhaps I should start with the most pressing issue for me.  I need 64-bit 
> indexing 
> 
> @Martin,
>    you indicated that even if I get this up and running, the MPI library 
> still uses signed 32-bit ints to count (your term), or index (my term) the 
> recvbuffer lengths.  More concretely,
> in a call to MPI_Allgatherv( buffer, count, MPI_Integer, recvbuf, recv-count, 
> displ, MPI_integer, MPI_COMM_WORLD, status, mpierr): count, recvcounts, and 
> displs must be  32-bit integers, not 64-bit.  Actually, all I need is displs 
> to hold 64-bit values...
> If this is true, then compiling OpenMPI this way is not a solution.  I'll 
> have to restructure my code to collect 31-bit chunks...
> Not that it matters, but I'm not using DIRAC, but a custom code to compute 
> circuit analyses.
> 
> @Jeff,
>   Interesting, your runtime behavior has a different error than mine.  You 
> have problems with the passed variable tempInt, which would make sense for 
> the reasons you gave.  However, my problem involves the fact that the local 
> variable "rank" gets overwritten by a memory corruption after MPI_RECV is 
> called.
> 
> Re: config.log. I will try to have the admin guy recompile tomorrow and see 
> if I can get the log for you.  
> 
> BTW, I'm using the gcc 4.7.2 compiler suite on a Rocks 5.4 HPC cluster.  I 
> use the options -m64 and -fdefault-integer-8
> 
> Cheers,
> --Jim
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Martin Siegert <sieg...@sfu.ca> wrote:
> Hi Jim,
> 
> I have quite a bit experience with compiling openmpi for dirac.
> Here is what I use to configure openmpi:
> 
> ./configure --prefix=$instdir \
>             --disable-silent-rules \
>             --enable-mpirun-prefix-by-default \
>             --with-threads=posix \
>             --enable-cxx-exceptions \
>             --with-tm=$torquedir \
>             --with-wrapper-ldflags="-Wl,-rpath,${instdir}/lib" \
>             --with-openib \
>             --with-hwloc=$hwlocdir \
>             CC=gcc \
>             CXX=g++ \
>             FC="$FC" \
>             F77="$FC" \
>             CFLAGS="-O3" \
>             CXXFLAGS="-O3" \
>             FFLAGS="-O3 $I8FLAG" \
>             FCFLAGS="-O3 $I8FLAG"
> 
> You need to set FC to either ifort or gfortran (those are the two compilers
> that I have used) and set I8FLAG to -fdefault-integer-8 for gfortran or
> -i8 for ifort.
> Set torquedir to the directory where torque is installed ($torquedir/lib
> must contain libtorque.so), if you are running jobs under torque; otherwise
> remove the --with-tm=... line.
> Set hwlocdir to the directory where you have hwloc installed. You many not
> need the -with-hwloc=... option because openmpi comes with a hwloc version
> (I don't have experience with that because we install hwloc independently).
> Set instdir to the directory where you what to install openmpi.
> You may or may not need the --with-openib option depending on whether
> you have an Infiniband interconnect.
> 
> After configure/make/make install this so compiled version can be used
> with dirac without changing the dirac source code.
> (there is one caveat: you should make sure that all "count" variables
> in MPI calls in dirac are smaller than 2^31-1. I have run into a few cases
> when that is not the case; this problem can be overcome by replacing
> MPI_Allreduce calls in dirac with a wrapper that calls MPI_Allreduce
> repeatedly). This is what I use to setup dirac:
> 
> export PATH=$instdir/bin
> ./setup --prefix=$diracinstdir \
>         --fc=mpif90 \
>         --cc=mpicc \
>         --int64 \
>         --explicit-libs="-lmkl_intel_ilp64 -lmkl_sequential -lmkl_core"
> 
> where $instdir is the directory where you installed openmpi from above.
> 
> I would never use the so-compiled openmpi version for anything other
> than dirac though. I am not saying that it cannot work (at a minimum
> you need to compile Fortran programs with the appropriate I8FLAG),
> but it is an unnecessary complication: I have not encountered a piece
> of software other than dirac that requires this.
> 
> Cheers,
> Martin
> 
> --
> Martin Siegert
> Head, Research Computing
> WestGrid/ComputeCanada Site Lead
> Simon Fraser University
> Burnaby, British Columbia
> Canada
> 
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 06:00:56PM -0500, Jim Parker wrote:
> >
> >    Jeff,
> >      Here's what I know:
> >    1.  Checked FAQs.  Done
> >    2.  Version 1.6.5
> >    3. config.log file has been removed by the sysadmin...
> >    4. ompi_info -a from head node is in attached as headnode.out
> >    5. N/A
> >    6. compute node info in attached as compute-x-yy.out
> >    7. As discussed, local variables are being overwritten after calls to
> >    MPI_RECV from Fortran code
> >    8. ifconfig output from head node and computes listed as *-ifconfig.out
> >    Cheers,
> >    --Jim
> >
> >    On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
> >    <[1]jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote:
> >
> >      Can you send the information listed here:
> >          [2]http://www.open-mpi.org/community/help/
> >
> >    On Oct 30, 2013, at 6:22 PM, Jim Parker <[3]jimparker96...@gmail.com>
> >    wrote:
> >    > Jeff and Ralph,
> >    >   Ok, I downshifted to a helloWorld example (attached), bottom line
> >    after I hit the MPI_Recv call, my local variable (rank) gets borked.
> >    >
> >    > I have compiled with -m64 -fdefault-integer-8 and even have assigned
> >    kind=8 to the integers (which would be the preferred method in my case)
> >    >
> >    > Your help is appreciated.
> >    >
> >    > Cheers,
> >    > --Jim
> >    >
> >    >
> >    >
> >    > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
> >    <[4]jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote:
> >    > On Oct 30, 2013, at 4:35 PM, Jim Parker <[5]jimparker96...@gmail.com>
> >    wrote:
> >    >
> >    > >   I have recently built a cluster that uses the 64-bit indexing
> >    feature of OpenMPI following the directions at
> >    > >
> >    [6]http://wiki.chem.vu.nl/dirac/index.php/How_to_build_MPI_libraries_fo
> >    r_64-bit_integers
> >    >
> >    > That should be correct (i.e., passing -i8 in FFLAGS and FCFLAGS for
> >    OMPI 1.6.x).
> >    >
> >    > > My question is what are the new prototypes for the MPI calls ?
> >    > > specifically
> >    > > MPI_RECV
> >    > > MPI_Allgathterv
> >    >
> >    > They're the same as they've always been.
> >    >
> >    > The magic is that the -i8 flag tells the compiler "make all Fortran
> >    INTEGERs be 8 bytes, not (the default) 4."  So Ralph's answer was
> >    correct in that all the MPI parameters are INTEGERs -- but you can tell
> >    the compiler that all INTEGERs are 8 bytes, not 4, and therefore get
> >    "large" integers.
> >    >
> >    > Note that this means that you need to compile your application with
> >    -i8, too.  That will make *your* INTEGERs also be 8 bytes, and then
> >    you'll match what Open MPI is doing.
> >    >
> >    > > I'm curious because some off my local variables get killed (set to
> >    null) upon my first call to MPI_RECV.  Typically, this is due (in
> >    Fortran) to someone not setting the 'status' variable to an appropriate
> >    array size.
> >    >
> >    > If you didn't compile your application with -i8, this could well be
> >    because your application is treating INTEGERs as 4 bytes, but OMPI is
> >    treating INTEGERs as 8 bytes.  Nothing good can come from that.
> >    >
> >    > If you *did* compile your application with -i8 and you're seeing this
> >    kind of wonkyness, we should dig deeper and see what's going on.
> >    >
> >    > > My review of mpif.h and mpi.h seem to indicate that the functions
> >    are defined as C int types and therefore , I assume, the coercion
> >    during the compile makes the library support 64-bit indexing.  ie. int
> >    -> long int
> >    >
> >    > FWIW: We actually define a type MPI_Fint; its actual type is
> >    determined by configure (int or long int, IIRC).  When your Fortran
> >    code calls C, we use the MPI_Fint type for parameters, and so it will
> >    be either a 4 or 8 byte integer type.
> >    >
> >    > --
> >    > Jeff Squyres
> >    > [7]jsquy...@cisco.com
> >    > For corporate legal information go to:
> >    [8]http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
> >    >
> >    > _______________________________________________
> >    > users mailing list
> >    > [9]us...@open-mpi.org
> >    > [10]http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
> >    >
> >
> >      >
> >      <mpi-test-64bit.tar.bz2>____________________________________________
> >      ___
> >
> >    > users mailing list
> >    > [11]us...@open-mpi.org
> >    > [12]http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
> >    --
> >    Jeff Squyres
> >    [13]jsquy...@cisco.com
> >    For corporate legal information go to:
> >    [14]http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
> >    _______________________________________________
> >    users mailing list
> >    [15]us...@open-mpi.org
> >    [16]http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
> >
> > References
> >
> >    1. mailto:jsquy...@cisco.com
> >    2. http://www.open-mpi.org/community/help/
> >    3. mailto:jimparker96...@gmail.com
> >    4. mailto:jsquy...@cisco.com
> >    5. mailto:jimparker96...@gmail.com
> >    6. 
> > http://wiki.chem.vu.nl/dirac/index.php/How_to_build_MPI_libraries_for_64-bit_integers
> >    7. mailto:jsquy...@cisco.com
> >    8. http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
> >    9. mailto:us...@open-mpi.org
> >   10. http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
> >   11. mailto:us...@open-mpi.org
> >   12. http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
> >   13. mailto:jsquy...@cisco.com
> >   14. http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
> >   15. mailto:us...@open-mpi.org
> >   16. http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
> 
> 
> > _______________________________________________
> > users mailing list
> > us...@open-mpi.org
> > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> us...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
> 
> 
> 
> <openmpi-1.6.5.config.tar.gz>_______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> us...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users


-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to: 
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

Reply via email to