On Jun 21, 2019, at 1:52 PM, Noam Bernstein <noam.bernst...@nrl.navy.mil <mailto:noam.bernst...@nrl.navy.mil> > wrote:
On Jun 21, 2019, at 4:45 PM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org <mailto:r...@open-mpi.org> > wrote: Hilarious - I wrote that code and I have no idea who added that option or what it is supposed to do. I can assure, however, that it isn’t implemented anywhere. Not really a big deal, since the documentation doesn’t explain them, and I was just grasping at straws. Are rankfiles implemented? Maybe I could use those (although binding/mapping command line arguments would definitely be easier). Perhaps if you tell us what pattern you are trying to get, we can advise you on the proper cmd line to get there? I thought that was in the original email. Basically, I have 2 18 core CPUs, and I want ranks 0-17 on slots 0-17 in cpu 0 and 18-35 on slots 0-17 in cpu 1. I’d have thought that would be straightforward, but everything I’ve tried ends up with i_task%2 == i_cpu, i.e. 0,2,4,… on cpu 0 and 1,3,5… on cpu 1. Too many emails to track :-( Should just be “--map-by core --rank-by core” - nothing fancy required. Sounds like you are getting --map-by node, or at least --rank-by node, which means somebody has set an MCA param either in the system config file or the environment. Noam ____________ | | | U.S. NAVAL | | _RESEARCH_ | LABORATORY Noam Bernstein, Ph.D. Center for Materials Physics and Technology U.S. Naval Research Laboratory T +1 202 404 8628 F +1 202 404 7546 https://www.nrl.navy.mil
_______________________________________________ users mailing list users@lists.open-mpi.org https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/users
