Hi List, If you have a setup consisting of more than one "front-end" server I think it would make sense to be able to specify more than one memcached server in sunstone. If for one reason or another a memcached server is not available anymore it can automatically try the next one configured (after $timeout value). Building this funtionality directly into sunstone gives you the benefit of "redundant" memcached servers without the need for cluster software taking care of this. If you let sunstone server A point to memcached server A (primary) and memached server B (secondary) and sunstone server B point to memcached server B (primary) and memcached server A (secondary) you've doubled the available memcached capacity during normal operations.
Are there any reasons _not_ to use two different (active) memcached servers? Cheers, Stefan -- | BIT BV http://www.bit.nl/ Kamer van Koophandel 09090351 | GPG: 0xD14839C6 +31 318 648 688 / [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
