I've been checking the API of Rack sessions put I don't find a way to do what you are proposing. I'll come back to this after I finish with some bugs I have in my backlog.
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Stefan Kooman <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi List, > > If you have a setup consisting of more than one "front-end" server I > think it would make sense to be able to specify more than one memcached > server in sunstone. If for one reason or another a memcached server is > not available anymore it can automatically try the next one configured > (after $timeout value). Building this funtionality directly into > sunstone gives you the benefit of "redundant" memcached servers without > the need for cluster software taking care of this. If you let sunstone > server A point to memcached server A (primary) and memached server B > (secondary) and sunstone server B point to memcached server B (primary) > and memcached server A (secondary) you've doubled the available > memcached capacity during normal operations. > > Are there any reasons _not_ to use two different (active) memcached > servers? > > Cheers, > > Stefan > > > -- > | BIT BV http://www.bit.nl/ Kamer van Koophandel 09090351 > | GPG: 0xD14839C6 +31 318 648 688 / [email protected] > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) > > iF4EAREIAAYFAlKDR2AACgkQTyGgYdFIOcbOYgEAwR7aRoaPgUh8n+Wa9xjAoZrH > mI9eGkdoq2mmOwalR74A/jtSqnUu3L9G6I8HbXsFcMUzk9jORtUb/1NcDsIjd6Pt > =uirV > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org > -- Javier Fontán Muiños Developer OpenNebula - The Open Source Toolkit for Data Center Virtualization www.OpenNebula.org | @OpenNebula | github.com/jfontan _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
