Hi Thibault, Have you released the patch to use redis instead of memcached? It can be a addition for a guide on Sunstone.
Cheers On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Thibault Galko <[email protected] > wrote: > Hi, > > Memcached does not support redundancy at server side, and Rack::Memcached > does not support it either as PHP memcached client does. > > I've implemented a patch to use Redis as replacement for memcached Session > using Rack:Redis in order to setup a true session failover with Redis > Replication in a Front-End Cluster. > > We plan to release it to the community, but you could contact me if you > need it asap. > > Best Regards, > > Sorry for my english .. > > -- > > Thibault GALKO > [image: BOSSTEK.FR] <http://www.bosstek.fr> > +33 (0)1 40 93 58 63 > [email protected] > > BOSSTEK - 150, Avenue de Verdun - 92320 Châtillon > > > > > > 2013/11/14 Javier Fontan <[email protected]> > >> I've been checking the API of Rack sessions put I don't find a way to >> do what you are proposing. I'll come back to this after I finish with >> some bugs I have in my backlog. >> >> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Stefan Kooman <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi List, >> > >> > If you have a setup consisting of more than one "front-end" server I >> > think it would make sense to be able to specify more than one memcached >> > server in sunstone. If for one reason or another a memcached server is >> > not available anymore it can automatically try the next one configured >> > (after $timeout value). Building this funtionality directly into >> > sunstone gives you the benefit of "redundant" memcached servers without >> > the need for cluster software taking care of this. If you let sunstone >> > server A point to memcached server A (primary) and memached server B >> > (secondary) and sunstone server B point to memcached server B (primary) >> > and memcached server A (secondary) you've doubled the available >> > memcached capacity during normal operations. >> > >> > Are there any reasons _not_ to use two different (active) memcached >> > servers? >> > >> > Cheers, >> > >> > Stefan >> > >> > >> > -- >> > | BIT BV http://www.bit.nl/ Kamer van Koophandel 09090351 >> > | GPG: 0xD14839C6 +31 318 648 688 / [email protected] >> > >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) >> > >> > iF4EAREIAAYFAlKDR2AACgkQTyGgYdFIOcbOYgEAwR7aRoaPgUh8n+Wa9xjAoZrH >> > mI9eGkdoq2mmOwalR74A/jtSqnUu3L9G6I8HbXsFcMUzk9jORtUb/1NcDsIjd6Pt >> > =uirV >> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Users mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Javier Fontán Muiños >> Developer >> OpenNebula - The Open Source Toolkit for Data Center Virtualization >> www.OpenNebula.org | @OpenNebula | github.com/jfontan >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org > > -- Javier Fontán Muiños Developer OpenNebula - The Open Source Toolkit for Data Center Virtualization www.OpenNebula.org | @OpenNebula | github.com/jfontan
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
