On 22 April 2010 18:11, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <[email protected]> wrote: > Chris Maciejewski wrote: >> On 22 April 2010 18:00, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Chris, >>> >>> running 2 opensips with different IPs ? because opensips saves in >>> location table its own socket (where the REGISTER was received), and if >>> the other server will try to use it, it will not recognize this socket >>> (as it is a different IP). >>> >>> Before going further, note that multiple opensips sharing the same >>> location table has some flows (due how SIP works) - like if you are >>> using multiple interfaces, of different port ; also NAT traversal will >>> not work. >>> >>> In the end, if you do not have NAT and using a single interface, you can >>> simply ignore those warnings. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Bogdan >>> >>> >> >> Hi Bogdan, >> >> Thanks for clarification. I am aware due to NAT traversal etc. >> multiple SIP registrar servers sharing the same location table will >> not work. >> >> I was just worried this WARNINGs might have some negative impact, but >> in that case I will just ignore them. >> > If opensips finds a non-local socket in a usrloc records, it will fire > the warning and use one of its own sockets for dealing with that contact. > > Regards, > Bogdan >
Ah, I see now. When UA1 registered at Proxy1 only, Nathelper OPTIONs are sent from both Proxy1 and Proxy2. This is not what I wanted :( Is there any way to make Proxy2 completely ignore UA1? Regards, Chris _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
