2010/4/22 Chris Maciejewski <[email protected]> > Hi, > > I made a diagram showing what I am trying to achieve: > > http://wima.co.uk/2x_opensips.pdf > > Is this possible at all? > Can we make two OpenSIPs share the same 'location' table, yet each > dealing only with it's "own" contacts? > > Regards, > Chris > > > On 22 April 2010 18:47, Brett Nemeroff <[email protected]> wrote: > > Just a quick question here.. can some of this be taken care of with a > > t_replicate for the register? > > > > Just a thought.. > > -Brett > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Chris Maciejewski <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On 22 April 2010 18:11, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> Chris Maciejewski wrote: > >>>> On 22 April 2010 18:00, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi Chris, > >>>>> > >>>>> running 2 opensips with different IPs ? because opensips saves in > >>>>> location table its own socket (where the REGISTER was received), and > if > >>>>> the other server will try to use it, it will not recognize this > socket > >>>>> (as it is a different IP). > >>>>> > >>>>> Before going further, note that multiple opensips sharing the same > >>>>> location table has some flows (due how SIP works) - like if you are > >>>>> using multiple interfaces, of different port ; also NAT traversal > will > >>>>> not work. > >>>>> > >>>>> In the end, if you do not have NAT and using a single interface, you > can > >>>>> simply ignore those warnings. > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards, > >>>>> Bogdan > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Hi Bogdan, > >>>> > >>>> Thanks for clarification. I am aware due to NAT traversal etc. > >>>> multiple SIP registrar servers sharing the same location table will > >>>> not work. > >>>> > >>>> I was just worried this WARNINGs might have some negative impact, but > >>>> in that case I will just ignore them. > >>>> > >>> If opensips finds a non-local socket in a usrloc records, it will fire > >>> the warning and use one of its own sockets for dealing with that > contact. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Bogdan > >>> > >> > >> Ah, I see now. > >> > >> When UA1 registered at Proxy1 only, Nathelper OPTIONs are sent from > >> both Proxy1 and Proxy2. This is not what I wanted :( > >> > >> Is there any way to make Proxy2 completely ignore UA1? > >> > >> Regards, > >> Chris > >> > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >
http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/2008-November/001729.html It can be a starting point. -Laszlo
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
