On 22 April 2010 19:52, Laszlo <[email protected]> wrote: > 2010/4/22 Chris Maciejewski <[email protected]> >> >> Hi, >> >> I made a diagram showing what I am trying to achieve: >> >> http://wima.co.uk/2x_opensips.pdf >> >> Is this possible at all? >> Can we make two OpenSIPs share the same 'location' table, yet each >> dealing only with it's "own" contacts? >> >> Regards, >> Chris >> >> >> On 22 April 2010 18:47, Brett Nemeroff <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Just a quick question here.. can some of this be taken care of with a >> > t_replicate for the register? >> > >> > Just a thought.. >> > -Brett >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Chris Maciejewski <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> On 22 April 2010 18:11, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >>> Chris Maciejewski wrote: >> >>>> On 22 April 2010 18:00, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <[email protected]> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> Hi Chris, >> >>>>> >> >>>>> running 2 opensips with different IPs ? because opensips saves in >> >>>>> location table its own socket (where the REGISTER was received), and >> >>>>> if >> >>>>> the other server will try to use it, it will not recognize this >> >>>>> socket >> >>>>> (as it is a different IP). >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Before going further, note that multiple opensips sharing the same >> >>>>> location table has some flows (due how SIP works) - like if you are >> >>>>> using multiple interfaces, of different port ; also NAT traversal >> >>>>> will >> >>>>> not work. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> In the end, if you do not have NAT and using a single interface, you >> >>>>> can >> >>>>> simply ignore those warnings. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Regards, >> >>>>> Bogdan >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> Hi Bogdan, >> >>>> >> >>>> Thanks for clarification. I am aware due to NAT traversal etc. >> >>>> multiple SIP registrar servers sharing the same location table will >> >>>> not work. >> >>>> >> >>>> I was just worried this WARNINGs might have some negative impact, but >> >>>> in that case I will just ignore them. >> >>>> >> >>> If opensips finds a non-local socket in a usrloc records, it will fire >> >>> the warning and use one of its own sockets for dealing with that >> >>> contact. >> >>> >> >>> Regards, >> >>> Bogdan >> >>> >> >> >> >> Ah, I see now. >> >> >> >> When UA1 registered at Proxy1 only, Nathelper OPTIONs are sent from >> >> both Proxy1 and Proxy2. This is not what I wanted :( >> >> >> >> Is there any way to make Proxy2 completely ignore UA1? >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Chris >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/2008-November/001729.html > > It can be a starting point. > > -Laszlo >
Hi Laszlo, thanks for the link, but it seems to me it describes slightly different scenario (when REGISTER is replicated to another Opensips instance). I would like each of my opensips servers to have it's own registered contacts in a common 'location' table. As presented in my diagram above. Regards, Chris _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
