Hi Klaus, Many thanks!
Adrian On May 20, 2010, at 6:48 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote: > Hi Adrian! > > I just tested with A1 communicator (a branded Bria) and A1oIP service > (unfortunately I do not know the vendor of the presence server). > > Scenario: > > A1 >---PUBLISH--\ > Presence Server>--NOTIFY--> B > A2 >---PUBLISH--/ > > > A1 is available, A2 is "offline": > > XML document sent to B: > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?> > <presence xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf" > xmlns:ci="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid" > xmlns:dm="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:data-model" > xmlns:lt="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:location-type" > xmlns:r="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid" entity="sip:[email protected]"> > <tuple id="tc66deb3a"> > <status> > <basic>closed</basic> > </status> > <timestamp>2010-05-20T15:29:05Z</timestamp> > </tuple> > > <tuple id="t096a4143"> > <status> > <basic>open</basic> > </status> > <timestamp>2010-05-20T15:22:51Z</timestamp> > </tuple> > <dm:person id="p751bb06a"> > <dm:note>Offline</dm:note> > <dm:timestamp>2010-05-20T15:29:05Z</dm:timestamp> > </dm:person> > > <dm:person id="p2a1d2439"> > <r:activities> > <r:busy/> > </r:activities> > <dm:note>Busy</dm:note> > <dm:timestamp>2010-05-20T15:22:51Z</dm:timestamp> > </dm:person> > </presence> > > > > Rendering of the 2 tuples by A1 communicator: see screenshot > The icon is green (available), but the word "offline" is added. > > > regards > Klaus > > > Am 11.05.2010 17:48, schrieb Adrian Georgescu: >> I could not figure out any differences in signaling or XCAP between latest >> Bria and previous Eyebeam. >> >> They seem to be the same software with a different skin. >> >> Adrian >> >> On May 11, 2010, at 5:18 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote: >> >>> Anca, I recently found out that there is a beta of X-Lite 4.0 which >>> looks like as it is based on Bria. I have not tested it, but you may >>> want to give it a try. >>> http://www.counterpath.com/x-lite-download.html >>> >>> regards >>> Klaus >>> >>> Am 11.05.2010 11:20, schrieb Anca Vamanu: >>>> Klaus Darilion wrote: >>>>> Am 01.04.2010 16:30, schrieb Adrian Georgescu: >>>>> >>>>>> On Apr 1, 2010, at 3:10 PM, Schumann Sebastian wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Bogdan >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, in an "ideal world", this re-publishing with BUSY and ONLINE is >>>>>>> wanted, but the toggling not. Priorities would help (you'd receive >>>>>>> that but not trigger anything on the user interface as the highest >>>>>>> priority will keep its state), but we don't have them yet, so in >>>>>>> that case the decision must be made somewhere else or not at all. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> All we need is a good client to figure out how to use these concepts, >>>>>> right? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Regarding clients: >>>>> >>>>> AFAIK Microsoft's Communicator SUBSCRIBEs its own presence and as soon >>>>> as you manually set the status on one of your clients, all other clients >>>>> will change its state too. >>>>> >>>>> And there is the A1 Communicator (a branded Bria softphone) which >>>>> displays an aggregated state, e.g. if a buddy is online with 2 clients, >>>>> one sending "online", one sending "offline", you will see something like >>>>> "online (offline)" on the buddy list. >>>>> >>>>> regards >>>>> klaus >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Hi Klaus, >>>> >>>> Bria - CounterPath? It's a very good piece of information and if so I >>>> could test this while at SIPIT as counterpath is bringing bria there. >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > <a1communicator-online-offline2.gif> _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
