But nobody forces you put an email address as contact into the tuple. Just take the good ideas and ignore the bad ideas.
regards Klaus Am 26.05.2010 19:55, schrieb Iñaki Baz Castillo: > 2010/5/26 Klaus Darilion<[email protected]>: >> Am 26.05.2010 10:33, schrieb Iñaki Baz Castillo: >>> >>> Also remember: according to IETF's SIMPLE group brains, if you have a >>> working e-mail address (can receive mails) then your SIP presentity >>> should display you as "available via mail" (WTF ?!?!?). >> >> How should it display this? As a<note> with status "closed"? > > Yes, but IETF suggests that your UA should publish a<tuple> with > <contact>mailto:[email protected]</contact> and<basic>open</basic>. > > Imagine I'm at home but my phone is in DND and "offline" status. > Anyone could come to my home and call me (using the human voice). > Should my SIP device publish that "I'm available by human voice at > home" (<basic>open</basic>) ? > > It seems that IETF SIMPLE group claims that SIMPLE presence should > cover *any* presence status. This makes most usual cases unclear and > complex. > IMHO a user could publish "I'm available on mail" and also provide an > email account, but it shouldn't mean a "open" status at all as this is > SIP, no SMTP/POP. > > When a specification tries to cover all the world and dominate all the > rest, it becomes... COMPLEX. > > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
