Hi Vlad, Indeed, you are right, we are receiving a 487 without a to-tag, but this doesn't happen before. There are no visible side-effects until now, beyond the message and I have less than 0.05% of expired dialogs. I'm not sure what to do, this messages wasn't appearing in version 1.6.4.
U 2012/04/04 18:43:32.062194 x.y.z.w -> x1.y1.z1.w1:5060 SIP/2.0 487 Cancelled. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.201.194.226;branch=z9hG4bKeeb2.0bb7a9c1.1. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 187.85.30.195;rport=5060;received=---.---.---.---;branch=z9hG4bKac1009787257. Record-Route: <sip:--.--.--.--;lr;ftag=1c1009364722;did=7bb.e636af54>. From: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=1c1009364722. To: <sip:[email protected];user=phone>. Call-ID: [email protected]. CSeq: 1 INVITE. Allow: INVITE,ACK,CANCEL,BYE,UPDATE,REGISTER,PRACK,INFO,NOTIFY,REFER. Cisco-Guid: 63185-1380843536-2264320347-2980804337. Contact: <sip:[email protected]>. User-Agent: TELES.iGATE 39019358305613 14.6b 940. Content-Length: 0. Flavio E. Goncalves CEO - V.Office On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Vlad Paiu <[email protected]> wrote: > ** > Hi Flavio, > > It seems the 487 that is received does not have a To Tag, and thus that > error. > Aside from the error in the log file, is there any other miss-behaviour, > like the dialog hanging, etc ? > > Regards, > > Vlad Paiu > OpenSIPS Developerhttp://www.opensips-solutions.com > > > On 04/05/2012 02:29 PM, Flavio Goncalves wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm using the latest SVN and validate_dialog, but the problem persists. > When I check the CANCEL coming from the originator everything seems ok. > > Flavio E. Goncalves > > > > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Rudy <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Flavio, >> >> If I am not mistaken, this may have been fixed after the release of >> 1.7.2, make sure you are building from SVN >> https://opensips.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/opensips/branches/1.7 to >> ensure you got the fix(es) . >> >> Regards, >> --Rudy >> Dynamic Packet >> Toll-Free: 888.929.VOIP ( 8647 ) >> >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Flavio Goncalves >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi Rudy, >> > >> > Thanks for your reply, I'm using 1.7.2, The validate_dialog was >> commented, I >> > will enable it later and check the results. >> > >> > Best Regards, >> > >> > Flavio E. Goncalves >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Rudy <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hey Flavio! >> >> >> >> Hope all is well in Brazil. Is this the latest 1.8.x branch? Also, >> >> are you using validate_dialog() and fix_route_dialog() in your loose >> >> route ? I remember something similar with CANCELs of early dialogs >> >> happening to us. The issue I am mentioning was patched sometime ago... >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> --Rudy >> >> Dynamic Packet >> >> Toll-Free: 888.929.VOIP ( 8647 ) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
