On 06/06/15 10:46, Jacco Ligthart wrote:
On 06/05/2015 09:33 PM, Jacco Ligthart wrote:
On 06/05/2015 09:08 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
On 05/06/15 18:57, Jacco Ligthart wrote:
On 05/19/2015 02:36 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
I have submitted the application for redsleeve.pool.ntp.org. It
may be a week or so before the application is reviewed.
any update of this?
Unfortunately, I haven't heard anything back. The application is still
in the "pending" status. :-(
I suggest we proceed with the generic entries:
server 0.pool.ntp.org
server 1.pool.ntp.org
server 2.pool.ntp.org
server 3.pool.ntp.org
OK. shame of the work, I got the redsleeve pool ones already standing by.
This isn't as easy as it sounds. The 4 srpms in question all have some
kind of template for their config file. Changing to [0-3].pool.ntp.org
would require changing the template and hacking the filling of it.
Besides, I read this [http://www.pool.ntp.org/vendors.html]:
You *must absolutely not use the default pool.ntp.org zone names* as the
default configuration in your application or appliance.
maybe just delay the debranding, until our pool is available?
Fair enough. Hopefully the CentOS guys will forgive us for using
their NTP pool for a while.
Gordan
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.redsleeve.org/mailman/listinfo/users
