On 06/05/2015 09:33 PM, Jacco Ligthart wrote:
> On 06/05/2015 09:08 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
>> On 05/06/15 18:57, Jacco Ligthart wrote:
>>> On 05/19/2015 02:36 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
>>>> I have submitted the application for redsleeve.pool.ntp.org. It
>>>> may be a week or so before the application is reviewed.
>>>>
>>> any update of this?
>>
>> Unfortunately, I haven't heard anything back. The application is still
>> in the "pending" status. :-(
>>
>> I suggest we proceed with the generic entries:
>>
>> server 0.pool.ntp.org
>> server 1.pool.ntp.org
>> server 2.pool.ntp.org
>> server 3.pool.ntp.org
>>
>
> OK. shame of the work, I got the redsleeve pool ones already standing by.

This isn't as easy as it sounds. The 4 srpms in question all have some
kind of template for their config file. Changing to [0-3].pool.ntp.org
would require changing the template and hacking the filling of it.
Besides, I read this [http://www.pool.ntp.org/vendors.html]:
You *must absolutely not use the default pool.ntp.org zone names* as the
default configuration in your application or appliance.

maybe just delay the debranding, until our pool is available?

Jacco
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.redsleeve.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to