On Jan 16, 2013, at 3:19 AM, "A.L.E.C" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 01/15/2013 08:04 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: >> Roundcube decides to respect "Mail-Reply-To:" and to ignore "Reply-To:". > > This chunk of code tells everything. What's wrong here in your opinion? I dont think the code is wrong, but it's a matter of his expectations not matching. I think everything works as he expects as long as you dont define a Reply-To in roundcube settings. If you set a reply-to: in roundcube settings, and then reply to the RCU list from roundcube, the headers are like: Mail-Reply-To: michael Reply-To: michael, RCU The response will only go to michael, and not to the list unless you do reply-all. But i dont necessarily see that as a problem, because thats what he told roundcube to do in the roundcube settings. Reindl, you're right, I didnt tell the whole story. Mailinglists tend to not be very consistent between mail clients, or mailinglist software, on their behavior on reply. So I tend to do reply-all, and then manually remove the recipients I dont want. It makes me think about where I want the reply to go every single time. As an example, with the above settings, OSX MAil on reply , will reply to michael and RCU , because it doesnt support Mail-Reply-To:. So roundcube as a mailclient, and OSX mail client behave differently on the same button. For some people this could be confusing. If I would let OSX Mail do it's thing with those settings, it would send two emails, without me using reply-all, because roundcube has added a Reply-To with 2 recipients. And people wonder why there are 2 replies :) Again, this is why i always manually edit recipients on mailinglists by doing a reply-all and seeing what magical recipients the software has decided to add for me this time. Cor _______________________________________________ Roundcube Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/users
