On 10 August 2010 15:55, Fabian Arrotin <[email protected]> wrote: > Alan Bartlett wrote: >> >> On 10 August 2010 10:57, Fabian Arrotin <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Alan Bartlett wrote: > > <big snip> > >> There is no competition between the ELRepo Project and the CentOS >> Project, from where my colleagues and I stand. Are you, Fabian with >> your more intimate knowledge of the internal workings of the CentOS >> Project, telling me that the developers of the CentOS Project have >> decided that there should be a competition? If so, sorry, we decline >> to take part. > > Not at all, I was just curious, that's all :-) > BTW, i'm not myself a CentOS developer, just someone who had a @centos.org > email address alias by accident ;-)
That, I know. But it is good that you mention it for others who are not aware of the fact. > That's a good point that ELRepo provides kmod for RHEL (or > derivatives/clones) but on the other hand I also hope that CentOS will > continue to provide those drbd packages in the Extras repo, so that all the > CentOS users can directly install them without having to install [another] > third-party repo. Wearing my associate of, supporter of and user of CentOS hat, I agree with that sentiment. > If those packages are exactly at the same level and no diff exists between > them, why not using the same spec that can be used for ELRepo and Extras at > the same time ? Maybe i'm dreaming a little bit but i'm sure Ralph (who is > now the drbd package maintainer for CentOS) doesn't mind at all on that > point ... Wearing my co-founder and administrator of the ELRepo Project hat, I would leave it with Ralph to make contact and discuss that with us. Alan / burakkucat. _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/users
