From: users <[email protected]> on behalf of "[email protected]" 
<[email protected]>
Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Users 
mailing list for Scilab <[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, 16 October 2018 at 09:53
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Scilab-users] HDF5 save is super slow

Couldn't you create your own atom package that restore this raw memory dump for 
scilab 6.0?
I understand why we moved away from this model, but it seems to be key for you.
There is always a trade-off between portability (and robustness) and raw 
speed...

Yeah, if that was possible, I would certainly do it. We already have a bunch of 
C/C++ binaries that we compile and link dynamically, but for that to be easy to 
implement, I guess the lists and structures need to be stored linearly in one 
consecutive chunk of memory. I don’t know if that is the case. Anyone? C++ 
integrations and gateways are very poorly documented at the moment.
Otherwise, I would need to do some recursive implementation, that handles a 
bunch of different object types. Sounds painful.

Cheers,
Arvid
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to