On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 11:56, Moretti, Luciano (MED) wrote: > Great Idea! > > Unfortunately, wget works fine. The file comes down no problem.
That's definitely strange then. Are you getting any error at all from Maven? > Thanks, > Luciano Moretti > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 10:52 AM > To: Maven Users List > Subject: RE: Unable to download jal-0.2.jar > > > On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 11:45, Moretti, Luciano (MED) wrote: > > Unfortunately, it doesn't look like our webserver is logging much of > > anything- even when I download a different jar, it's not appearing in > > the access log. > > > > There are entries in the error log for trying to get jars that are on > > ibiblio & for MD5 sum files that we don't have on our server. > > > > I just tried to get a jar version that I know doesn't exist, and that > > error does show up in the error log. > > I also deleted jal-0.2.jar and tried to get it- It didn't show up in > the > > error log. > > Martin's suggestion was a good one: if you can't retrieve the file using > wget then you know it's something on your end. > > > Thank you again, > > Luciano Moretti > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 10:26 AM > > To: Maven Users List > > Subject: RE: Unable to download jal-0.2.jar > > > > > > On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 11:22, Moretti, Luciano (MED) wrote: > > > All the files have permissions set to 644, same owner & same group. > > > > > > We're using http:// for the repository. > > > > And what do the logs of your webserver say when trying to retrieve the > > problem JAR? > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Luciano Moretti > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 10:21 AM > > > To: Maven Users List > > > Subject: Re: Unable to download jal-0.2.jar > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 11:08, Moretti, Luciano (MED) wrote: > > > > Maven is refusing to get jal-0.2.jar out our private remote > > > repository. > > > > > > > > If I rename it to jal-0.3.jar or jal-0.1.jar or jal-0.21 and > change > > > the > > > > POM to reflect the version change, it gets it fine. > > > > > > > > I've tried renaming other jars to version 0.2 thinking that there > > was > > > a > > > > bug resolving dependencies with versions 0.2, but they work fine. > > > > > > > > I'm at a loss of Ideas on how to get this to work. > > > > > > That's the first time I've heard that reported. Have you looked at > > basic > > > things like permissions. Did you rename the JAR or did you copy it > and > > > thereby possibly giving it different permissions? Are you using > > file:// > > > or http:// for your repository? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Luciano Moretti > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
