On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 12:06, W. Sean Hennessy wrote:
> Jason,
>
> Please, I beseech you to reconsider the "make target/ your only choice" limitation.
> We acknowledge that a standard directory structure facilitates maintenance.
> However, please, consider that the specific folder naming could be defined as
> configurable items. We still benefit from
> the existing directory the structure and the jelly scripts behavior is preserved.
>
> "target/" becomes "${target-dir-nm}/" in build.xml and jelly.
>
> with
> # ------------------
> # build.properties
> # ------------------
> bin-dir-nm=bin
> target-dir-nm=target
> conf-dir-nm=conf
> dist-dir-nm=dist
> lib-dir-nm=lib
> sql-dir-nm=sql
> src-dir-nm=src
> tst-dir-nm=test
> web-dir-nm=web
> xdoc-dir-nm=xdoc
>
> Thanks for your consideration.
>
Ok, in your opinion what would be the advantage of making these things
above configurable? Do you really care that much if all classes are
output to target/ ?
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://tambora.zenplex.org
In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational
and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it.
-- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
