Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > >> lukewpatterson wrote: >> Before, it seems the custom goals were merged with the standard "jar" >> packaging goals. > > If you can provide a complete example project to show this merging I > would be really surprised. > >> lukewpatterson wrote: >> Now, it seems like they replace the standard goals. > > Which is the expected behavior, the mapping is supposed to be a full > self-contained description, not an overlay. >
Thanks Benjamin, everything is working ok. This was an example of a sleeper-corner-case mixed with a healthy does of ignorance. The custom "jar" packaging type was indeed never active with Maven 2.x, I have no idea why it existed in that plugin's metadata and I have no idea why it was enabled in the consumer via <extension>. The "overlay" behavior was simply other plugins running which were explicitly bound to phases. I forgot that the other phases exist regardless of whether or not they are listed in the custom lifecycle mappings. Thanks for your help. Other than that, everything works great, and seems to be about 33% faster overall. -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/PLEASE-TEST-Apache-Maven-3-0-RC1-tp2841339p2848218.html Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
