As much fun as all this commentary is, unless Ken comes back and posts
a reply, I feel like we're simply the victims of a drive-by
trolling...

As such, I recommend letting this thread die, at least until Ken comes
back and adds something to the discussion... Ken???

Wayne

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Rick Mangi <[email protected]> wrote:
> Flexible and elegant aren't necessarily the same thing... Any language that
> prides itself on its ability to be obfuscated can't be elegant ;-)
>
> That said, I do love it.
>
> As far as Maven goes, the elegance of maven is that it does 90% of what you
> need it to do with very little or no effort and the other 10% can be done
> without much hassle.
>
>
> On 10/13/10 10:48 AM, "Kathryn Huxtable" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> It does. The rest of the language is rather ugly, though. -K
>>
>> On Oct 13, 2010, at 9:07 AM, Rick Mangi wrote:
>>
>>> I just enjoyed the bit about perl having elegant and concise data structures
>>> :-)
>>>
>>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to